Indian Journal of Orthopaedics

TUMOUR
Year
: 2005  |  Volume : 39  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 151--157

Reconstructive options in pelvic tumours


N Mayilvahanan1, JC Bose2 
1 Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Madras Medical College & Research Institute, Govt. General Hospital,Chennai, India
2 Surgical Oncologist, Govt. Royapettah Hospital, Chennai, India

Correspondence Address:
N Mayilvahanan
4, Lakshmi Street, Kilpauk,Chennai - 600 010
India

Background: Pelvic tumours present a complex problem. It is difficult to choose between limb salvage and hemipelvectomy. Method: Forty three patients of tumours of pelvis underwent limb salvage resection with reconstruction in 32 patients. The majority were chondrosarcomas (20 cases) followed by Ewing sarcoma. Stage II B was the most common stage in malignant lesions and all the seven benign lesions were aggressive (B3). Surgical margins achieved were wide in 31 and marginal in 12 cases. Ilium was involved in 51% of cases and periacetabular involvement was seen in 12 patients. The resections done were mostly of types I & II of Enneking«SQ»s classification of pelvic resection. Arthrodesis was attempted in 24 patients. Customized Saddle prosthesis was used in seven patients and no reconstruction in 12 patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to all high-grade malignant tumours, combined with radiotherapy in 7 patients. Results: With a mean follow up of 48.5 months and one patient lost to follow up, the recurrence rate among the evaluated cases was 16.6%. Oncologically, 30 patients were continuously disease free with 7 local recurrences and 4 deaths due to disseminated disease and 2 patients died of other causes. During the initial years, satisfactory functional results were achieved with prosthetic replacement. Long-term functional result of 36 patients who were alive at the time of latest follow up was satisfactory in 75% who underwent arthrodesis and in those where no reconstruction was used. We also describe a method of new classification of pelvic resections that clarifies certain shortcomings of the previous systems of classification. Conclusion: Selection of a procedure depends largely on the patient factors, the tumour grade, the resultant defect and the tissue factors. Resection with proper margins gives better functional and oncological results


How to cite this article:
Mayilvahanan N, Bose J C. Reconstructive options in pelvic tumours.Indian J Orthop 2005;39:151-157


How to cite this URL:
Mayilvahanan N, Bose J C. Reconstructive options in pelvic tumours. Indian J Orthop [serial online] 2005 [cited 2020 Feb 26 ];39:151-157
Available from: http://www.ijoonline.com/article.asp?issn=0019-5413;year=2005;volume=39;issue=3;spage=151;epage=157;aulast=Mayilvahanan;type=0