Neurobionplus
Home About Journal AHEAD OF PRINT Current Issue Back Issues Instructions Submission Search Subscribe Blog    
Login 

Users Online: 917 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 53  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 708-713

Effectiveness and safety of the combined use of tranexamic acid: A comparative observational study of 1909 cases


1 Department of Anesthesiology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
2 Department of Biostatistics, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon; University of Lyon I F-69100; Laboratory of Biometry and Biology, CNRS, UMR 5558, F-69100, Villeurbanne, France
3 Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Charles-Herve Vacheron
Departement D‘fanesthesie Reanimation, Hospices Civils De Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, 165 Chemin Du Grand Revoyet, 69310 Pierre Benite
France
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_148_19

Rights and Permissions

Background: Tranexamic acid (TA) use in lower-limb arthroplasty has been valued in these surgeries high-risk hemorrhagic due to its antifibrinolytic action. The objective of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of the combined intravenous (IV) and intraarticular (IA) administration of TA in lower-limb arthroplasty. Methods: We conduct a prospective observational study between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2017, including all programmed lower-limb arthroplasties. Patients were divided into four groups: no TA, 15 mg/kg IV TA, 3 g IA TA, and 15 mg/kg IV and 3 g IA. The effect on calculated total blood loss (milliliter of red blood cell [RBC]), hemoglobin, transfusion, and duration of hospitalization was studied after adjustment on age, American Society of Anesthesiologists, surgery, and postoperative curative anticoagulation. Complications related to TA administration were systematically reported. Results: A total of 1909 patients were included – “no TA,” n = 184; “IV,” n = 1137; “IA,” n = 214; and “IV + IA,” n = 374. In the IV + IA group, a decrease in blood loss was observed compared to the no TA group (+220 ml 95% confidence interval [CI] [184; 255] of RBCP < 0.001) and in the IA group (+65 ml 95% CI [30; 99] of RBCP < 0.001). The length of hospital stay of the IV + IA group was shorter compared to the no TA group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.35, 95% CI [0.29; 0.43],P < 0.001) to the IA group (HR 0.57, 95% CI [0.48; 0.69],P < 0.001) and the IV group (HR 0.45, 95% CI [0.39; 0.50],P < 0.001). One case of deep vein thrombosis occurred in the group without TA. Conclusion: Administration of combined TA appears effective and safe; further studies are needed in order to establish a consensual protocol.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed294    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded41    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal