Neurobionplus
Home About Journal AHEAD OF PRINT Current Issue Back Issues Instructions Submission Search Subscribe Blog    
Login 

Users Online: 660 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 53  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 324-332

Management of acquired compressive myelopathy due to spinal fluorosis


Department of Orthopaedics, B J Medical College, Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Jayprakash V Modi
D-302 Ozone Desire, Nr Columbia Asia Hospital, Ambli-Hebatpur Road, Thaltej, Ahmedabad - 380 054, Gujarat
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_570_17

Rights and Permissions

Background: Fluorosis is an endemic disease of India which causes compressive cervical and/or dorsal myelopathy. This study aims to evaluate the role of surgical management in the crippling fluorosis along with evaluation of radiological imaging as screening/diagnosing tool for the disease. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of 33 patients operated at tertiary care center having nontraumatic involvement of spinal cord affecting neurology with history, clinical and radiological features (Ossified Posterior Longitudinal Ligament-, Ossified Ligamentum flavum) suggesting fluorosis as the cause of compression. Outcomes were measured in terms of improvement in Nurick grading, Rankins scale, spasticity, Oswestry Disability Index, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores. Results: Spinal fluorosis is a male predominant disease affecting the elderly after years of fluorine intake. Cervical and/or dorsal spine are predominantly involved at multiple levels (>=2). Diagnosis of the disease poses difficulty due to lack of established laboratory parameters with high sensitivity, availability, and lack of awareness among surgeons. Skeletal survey alone has >90% sensitivity for diagnosing the disease. Once evaluated properly, decompression at correctly identified levels invariably improves the spasticity and quality of life immediately post-surgery. At final followup, there was on average improvement of 2 scales in nurick grade, rankins scale and ashworth grading whereas average improvement in ODI, mJOA and dorsal specific mJOA were 52%, 3.17 points and 2.7 points respectively. However, preoperative counselling for “apparent neurological deterioration” in immediate postoperative period is very important. Complications like infection and dural tear have to be prevented with special surgical tactics. Conclusion: Skeletal survey along with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging is cost-effective modality for the screening/diagnosis for fluorosis. Once developed, surgery, either curative or palliative, is the best treatment at crippling stage of the disease.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed329    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded25    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal