Home About Journal AHEAD OF PRINT Current Issue Back Issues Instructions Submission Search Subscribe Blog    

Users Online: 1919 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 

 Table of Contents    
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 48  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 440
Author's reply

1 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Chandrapur Multispeciality Hospital, Vivek Nagar, Chandrapur, India
2 Department of Orthopaedics, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Arthritis and Joint Replacement Clinic, Ramdaspeth, Nagpur, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication8-Jul-2014

How to cite this article:
Gadegone W, Lokhande V, Salphale Y, Ramteke A. Author's reply. Indian J Orthop 2014;48:440

How to cite this URL:
Gadegone W, Lokhande V, Salphale Y, Ramteke A. Author's reply. Indian J Orthop [serial online] 2014 [cited 2020 Feb 20];48:440. Available from:

We thank Kumar CY, [1] for keen interest in our article. [2] The reply to your each question is as follows.

We agree with the authors that these fractures are common in tertiary hospitals. Presentation of fractures in tertiary hospitals is not representative of the true incidence in the general population. Tip of the greater trochanter (GT) was the entry point for all our cases. We faced GT fractures in two cases. Careful graduated reaming prevented shattering of GT in the rest of the cases. Same nails of a single manufacturer (Yogeshwar Implants (I) Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India) were used for all cases. We fixed distal locking first as a matter of routine surgical technique at our hospital, which is influenced by our experience of fixation with proximal femoral nail. Temporary stabilization by 3 mm K-wires to avoid displacement of the proximal nail fracture construct is done before hand. No open reduction was needed for intracapsular fractures because in the majority of cases the fractures were undisplaced or minimally displaced. However, in a displaced fracture after stabilization of the femur, it is easy to reduce the fracture. Union in malposition was avoided because of careful closed reduction and fixation in satisfactory position aided by the implant in situ. Proper execution of the method can avoid the potential complication of malunion. Change of angle by osteotomy with or without bone graft leads to union in nonunion neck femur. The inherent differences in fracture biology between nonunion neck femur and shaft fractures need to be considered. [3] Primary grafting was not needed in our study.

   References Top

1.Kumar CY. Long proximal femoral nail in ipsilateral fractures proximal femur and shaft of femur. Indian J Orthop 2014;48;439-40.  Back to cited text no. 1
2.Gadegone W, Lokhande V, Salphale Y, Ramteke A. Long PFN for ipsilateral fractures of proximal femur and shaft of femur. Indian J Orthop 2013;47;272-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
3.Gadegone WM, Ramteke AA, Lokhande V, Salphade Y. Valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy and fibular strut graft in the management of neglected femoral neck fracture. Injury 2013;44:763-8.  Back to cited text no. 3

Correspondence Address:
Wasudeo Gadegone
Vivek Nagar, Mul Road, Chandrapur - 442 401
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.136318

Rights and Permissions


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded56    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal