Neurobionplus
Home About Journal AHEAD OF PRINT Current Issue Back Issues Instructions Submission Search Subscribe Blog    
Login 

Users Online: 1339 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
 


 
 Table of Contents    
LETTER TO EDITOR  
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 48  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 226
Four quadrant parallel peripheral screw fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients


Department of Orthopaedics, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication13-Mar-2014
 

How to cite this article:
Upadhyay S, Taqi Raza HK. Four quadrant parallel peripheral screw fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Indian J Orthop 2014;48:226

How to cite this URL:
Upadhyay S, Taqi Raza HK. Four quadrant parallel peripheral screw fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Indian J Orthop [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Dec 7];48:226. Available from: http://www.ijoonline.com/text.asp?2014/48/2/226/128776
Sir,

We read with great interest the recently published article [1] entitled "Four quadrant parallel peripheral screw fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients." Although we applaud the work, we wish to draw the attention of the authors to certain critical points which need to be clarified.

A study [2] reported that the triangular placement of screw had a higher peak load, higher ultimate load, less displacement, and more energy absorption before failure than other configurations. It has been demonstrated that the use of a fourth screw does not have a significant increase in mechanical advantage in most FNF. [3] We would like to know whether any biomechanical analysis was done before proposing the current configuration. Authors advocated the use of present technique in all possible cases of FNF in older population despite the fact that in basicervical FNF [4] and in Pauwels' Type III FNF, [5],[6] sliding hip screw with the derotational screw (biomechanical superiority) is an ideal implant for this fracture configuration. If the authors agree with this modality of treatment, how do they justify clubbing all the FNF together to compare the outcome? It has been shown in a cadaveric study [7] that the pattern of screw insertion is critical in determining the susceptibility of the bone to stress fracture. Authors [7] recommended not placing screws at the same level transversely as the vertical pattern is less apt to predispose a long bone to subsequent fracture than a horizontal pattern of screw insertion. In context of this cadaveric study we need justification from the current authors of placing parallel screws (transversely at two levels) in four quadrants. Furthermore we would like the authors to clarify the optimal screw positioning especially in cases of non-anatomical reduction (50% in present series).

Another thing that concerns us is the "absence of washers." It has been demonstrated [8] that use of washers significantly decreases the risk of fixation failure. In the present technique, authors have not used any washers. [1] We would like the authors to clarify this issue.

 
   References Top

1.Satish BR, Ranganadham AV, Ramalingam K, Tripathy SK. Four quadrant parallel peripheral screw fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Indian J Orthop 2013;47:174-81.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.Selvan VT, Oakley MJ, Rangan A, Al-Lami MK. Optimum configuration of cannulated hip screws for the fixation of intracapsular hip fractures: A biomechanical study. Injury 2004;35:136-41.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Holmes CA, Edwards WT, Myers ER, Lewallen DG, White AA 3 rd , Hayes WC. Biomechanics of pin and screw fixation of femoral neck fractures. J Orthop Trauma 1993;7:242-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Blair B, Koval KJ, Kummer F, Zuckerman JD. Basicervical fractures of the proximal femur. A biomechanical study of 3 internal fixation techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;306:256-63.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Baitner AC, Maurer SG, Hickey DG, Jazrawi LM, Kummer FJ, Jamal J, et al. Vertical shear fractures of the femoral neck. A biomechanical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;367:300-5.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Bonnaire FA, Weber AT. Analysis of fracture gap changes, dynamic and static stability of different osteosynthetic procedures in the femoral neck. Injury 2002;33 Suppl 3:C24-32.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Lichtblau S, Gallina J, Nasser P, Munyoki M, Jepsen K. A biomechanical comparison of two patterns of screw insertion. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2008;66:269-71.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Zlowodzki M, Weening B, Petrisor B, Bhandari M. The value of washers in cannulated screw fixation of femoral neck fractures. J Trauma 2005;59:969-75.  Back to cited text no. 8
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Sachin Upadhyay
Department of Orthopaedics, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Medical College, Jabalpur - 482 003, Madhya Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.128776

Rights and Permissions



This article has been cited by
1 Prognostic Factors Predicting Early Recovery of Pre-fracture Functional Mobility in Elderly Patients With Hip Fracture
Daegu Lee,Jae Yong Jo,Ji Sun Jung,Sang Jun Kim
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2014; 38(6): 827
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


 
    References
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1131    
    Printed18    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded136    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal