Neurobionplus
Home About Journal AHEAD OF PRINT Current Issue Back Issues Instructions Submission Search Subscribe Blog    
Login 

Users Online: 2128 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
 


 
 Table of Contents    
LETTER TO EDITOR  
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 47  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 317
Soft tissue coverage in open fractures of tibia


Department of Orthopaedics, GRMC, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication10-May-2013
 

How to cite this article:
Nema S, Vyas G S. Soft tissue coverage in open fractures of tibia. Indian J Orthop 2013;47:317

How to cite this URL:
Nema S, Vyas G S. Soft tissue coverage in open fractures of tibia. Indian J Orthop [serial online] 2013 [cited 2020 Feb 21];47:317. Available from: http://www.ijoonline.com/text.asp?2013/47/3/317/111515
Sir,

We read the article by Kamath et al. [1] with great interest.The article primarily addresses management of open injuries of tibia in tertiary health centers of India, where facilities of advanced plastic reconstructive surgery do not exist. The article nicely covers all aspect of plastic reconstructive procedures for such injuries with orthoplastic approach, but we do not agree with authors in certain sections of article.

Authors describe that there is a shift in approach for treatment of soft tissue defects in open fractures favoring nonmicrovascular flaps. This cannot be considered as a generalized rule. Unfortunately, many surgeons still believe that pedicle flaps have advantage over free flaps owing to the potential for loss of free flaps. Mathes and Nahai [2] reviewed a large series of conventional flaps found approximately 10% loss of significant portion of flap; on the contrary, microsurgical free flap transfer has a well established overall failure rate of around 5%. [3] Even series of lower extremity flaps in the presence of severe injury have a success rate of 90-98%. [4] The authors have stated a flap loss of 25% has no basis. It is true that microsurgical flaps are more demanding and require more sophisticated setup with surgical skills, but we cannot label a procedure to be failure because it is more demanding.

Under Materials and Methods authors state that the flap was delayed in period 1. We want to know what was the period of delay? How they kept the bone covered during the period of delay? Because procedures of delay in flaps in particular reference to bone coverage will invite necrosis of the bone due to exposure during the period of delay. [5]

The crossed leg flap has its own advantages due to its simple application, but authors failed to comment on long periods of recumbence, awkward position of limbs, potential for venous thrombosis in leg and failure rates up to 20% associated with this flap. [6]

 
   References Top

1.Kamath JB, Shetty MS, Joshua TV, Kumar A, Harshvardhan, Naik DM. Soft tissue coverage in open fractures of tibia. Indian J Orthop 2012;46:462-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.Nahai F, Mathes SJ. Musculocutaneous flap or muscle flap and skin graft? Ann Plast Surg 1984;12:199-203.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Harashina T. Analysis of 200 free flaps. Br J PlastSurg 1988;41:33-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Khouri RK, Shaw WW. Reconstruction of the lower extremity with microvascular free flaps: A 10-year experience with 304 consecutive cases. J Trauma 1989;29:1086-94.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Wood T, Sameem M, Avram R, Bhandari M, Petrisor B. A systematic review of early versus delayed wound closure in patients with open fractures requiring flap coverage. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012;72:1078-85.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Pederson WC, Sanders WE. Bone and soft-tissue reconstruction. In: Rockwood CA. Jr, editor. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. 4 th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996. p. 354.  Back to cited text no. 6
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Sandeep Nema
Department of Orthopaedics, GRMC, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh - 474 009
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.111515

Rights and Permissions



This article has been cited by
1 Authoręs reply
Kamath, J. and Shetty, M. and Joshua, T. and Kumar, A. and Harshvardhan and Naik, D.
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2013; 47(3): 317-318
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


 
    References
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1191    
    Printed26    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded107    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal