Neurobionplus
Home About Journal AHEAD OF PRINT Current Issue Back Issues Instructions Submission Search Subscribe Blog    
Login 

Users Online: 1825 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 47  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 31-34

Midterm results of cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty in patellectomized patients


Department of Orthopaedics, Medanta Bone and Joint Institute, Medanta, the Medicity Sector 38, Gurgaon, Haryana, India

Correspondence Address:
Vivek Dahiya
Department of Orthopaedics, Medanta Bone and Joint Institute, Medanta, the Medicity, Sector 38, Gurgaon, Haryana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.106891

Rights and Permissions

Background : Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patellectomized patients gives inferior results when compared with those in which the patella is present. The literature is ambiguous about the role of cruciate retaining or sacrificing implants for these knees. In this study, we assessed the midterm results of TKA in patellectomized knees using a cruciate retaining implant. Materials and Methods: Thirty three patients with a prior patellectomy underwent a cruciate retaining TKA and were followed up for an average of 9.3 years (range 2-14 years). At each followup visit, they were evaluated clinically, radiologically and by the Hospital for Special Surgery Scoring System. Results: Twenty one knees did not have any pain or difficulty in climbing stairs, 10 knees were slightly painful on stairs but pain free on walking on flat ground and two knees experienced mild to moderate pain on walking up and down stairs as well as on flat ground. The average range of motion preoperatively was 87° , which postoperatively increased to 118° . The average Hospital for Special Surgery Knee scores increased from 52 to 89 points. None of the knees showed any progressive radiolucencies or evidence of any loosening/osteolysis or fractures in followup. Conclusion: Cruciate retaining TKA offers good results at midterm followup in patients with a prior patellectomy.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2162    
    Printed34    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded105    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal