Neurobionplus
Home About Journal AHEAD OF PRINT Current Issue Back Issues Instructions Submission Search Subscribe Blog    
Login 

Users Online: 1512 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
 


 
 Table of Contents    
REVIEW ARTICLE  
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 45  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 116-124
Bicondylar tibial fractures: Internal or external fixation?


Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, L7 8XP, United Kingdom

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication26-Feb-2011
 

   Abstract 

Bicondylar fractures of the tibia, representing the Schatzker V and VI fractures represent a challenging problem. Any treatment protocol should aim at restoring articular congruity and the metaphyseo-diaphsyeal dissociation (MDD)-both of these are equally important to long-term outcome. Both internal and external fixations have their proponents, and each method of treatment is associated with its unique features and complications. We review the initial and definitive management of these injuries, and the advantages and disadvantages of each method of definitive fixation. We suggest the use of a protocol for definitive management, using either internal or external fixation as deemed appropriate. This protocol is based on the fracture configuration, local soft tissue status and patient condition. In a nutshell, if the fracture pattern and soft tissue status are amenable plate fixation (single or double) is performed, otherwise limited open reduction and articular surface reconstruction with screws and circular frame is performed.

Keywords: Bicondylar fracture, circular external fixation, complications, internal fixation, minimally invasive, tibia, Ilizarov

How to cite this article:
Kumar G, Peterson N, Narayan B. Bicondylar tibial fractures: Internal or external fixation?. Indian J Orthop 2011;45:116-24

How to cite this URL:
Kumar G, Peterson N, Narayan B. Bicondylar tibial fractures: Internal or external fixation?. Indian J Orthop [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Dec 10];45:116-24. Available from: http://www.ijoonline.com/text.asp?2011/45/2/116/77130

   Introduction Top


Bicondylar fractures of the tibia, representing the Schatzker V and VI fractures, and largely part of the AO-OTA "C" type fractures [Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (German for Association for Study of Internal Fixation) - Orthopaedic Trauma Association] [Figure 1] present a bimodal spectrum of severity. They are often high-energy injuries in young patients, but are becoming increasingly prevalent in elderly patients, often consequent on low-energy falls. The goal of treatment of these injuries is reduction of the articular surface, and restoration of the metaphyseo-diaphyseal dissociation (MDD). The most important factor in deciding the timing and modality of definitive management is the status of local soft tissues.
Figure 1: Schatzker classification of bicondylar fractures

Click here to view


In order to extract the relevant indexed publications regarding management of tibial bicondylar fractures, a PubMed search was performed using terms "tibia, bicondylar, plateau, Schatzker V, VI, external fixator, circular frame, minimally invasive, open fracture, complications". Further searches were conducted on Medline via Health Informatics Resources (formerly known as National Library for Health) for the key words mentioned. This website has an advanced healthcare database search that allows Boolean operators and wildcard. It also allows combining results of key words searched. We analyzed the publications extracted with regard to their relevance to the preparation of this article. The publications deemed to be appropriate were assessed according to methods, materials, analytic methods, merits and drawbacks and the relevance of the conclusions and were cited appropriately.


   Evolution of Treatment Top


Non-operative treatment of bicondylar fractures, in the era before the use of internal fixation, yielded "acceptable results" as shown by Rasmussen in the early 1970s and in a 20-year follow-up by Lansinger et al. [1] The main complications of non-operative management included stiffness and mal-union. With increasing patient expectations, and the recognition of complications of non-operative treatment, operative management assumed ascendancy. Traditional techniques of open reduction and rigid internal fixation of both condyles through a single anterior incision needed soft tissue stripping, and not unexpectedly, were associated with wound healing complications when adopted for all bicondylar fractures. [2],[3] Fine-wire external fixation as a means of reassembling the MDD gained popularity [4],[5] but it was recognized that this method was associated with its own unique complications such as the potential for septic arthritis of the knee due to intra-articular wire placement, and the risk of pin site infection. The introduction of modern plates with outriggers for insertion (such as the Less Invasive Skeletal Stabilization System - LISS) allows insertion of plates through smaller incisions, minimizing soft tissue damage. The capacity to use locking screws in these modern implants raises the feasibility of securely capturing the opposite condyle - a feature that can be exploited in fixing bicondylar fractures with a single lateral plate. [6]


   Considerations in Preoperative Planning Top


Management of tibial bicondylar fractures is influenced by the patient's condition as a whole, the surgeons' assessment of the "fracture personality", and most importantly, local soft tissue status.

Patient-related factors include age, co-morbidities, associated injuries, as well as the patient's expectations of function following treatment. Salient aspects of the fracture personality that affect management and outcome are the degree of articular and metaphyseal comminution, bone loss, and the direction of the fracture lines. Soft tissue swelling can become significant enough to cause raised compartment pressures even in an apparently low-energy injury. In high-energy injuries, bruising and loss of skin integrity can take a few days to manifest even if there are no obvious skin wounds at presentation.


   Initial Treatment Top


Tibial bicondylar fractures typically occur in young patients with high-energy injuries and these patients should be assessed as per the ATLS® protocol (Advanced Trauma Life Support, American College of Surgeons). [7] Specific to tibial bicondylar fractures, assessment should include soft tissue status, distal neurovascular status, and continued monitoring for compartment syndrome.

Local damage control of a tibial bicondylar fracture is best achieved with stable spanning external fixation. This allows provisional reduction of the fracture, maintains fracture alignment and leg length, gives excellent pain control, helps in reduction of swelling, and allows for unhindered assessment and care of soft tissues. It also allows easy monitoring for compartment syndrome. Furthermore, it allows painless transport for patients to specialist trauma centers. Concerns about the possible risk of compartment syndrome due to acute restoration of length, and the increased risk of thrombo-embolic phenomena have proven unfounded. [8],[9] Spanning fixation does not cause long-term restriction of knee movement. [10]

A monolateral fixator, with two anteroposterior pins in the femur, and two anteroposterior pins in the tibia allows reasonably quick, easy and reproducible application. Care must be taken to avoid the zone of soft-tissue injury and bony injury - typically, the pins are placed at least 2 to 3 cm away from the furthest limit of bony injury visible on radiographs, and the same distance from visible soft-tissue injury. The knee joint is kept in about 15 degrees of flexion to allow non-weight-bearing mobilization of the extremity.

Additional pins, typically lateral to medial in the distal femur, and anteromedial to posterolateral in the tibia can be used for increased stability. [11]


   Further Investigation Top


Prior to availability of computed tomography (CT) scans, oblique radiographs of the knee joint complemented standard anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the knee and proximal tibia. Presently, CT scanning, using 3-mm cuts is the investigation of choice for accurate assessment of the fracture. Scans should be performed only after application of spanning external fixation - this eliminates the possibility of multiple overlapping shadows, including an impacted femoral condyle interfering with interpretation of the scan [Figure 2]. The axial cuts are studied to understand the direction of the fracture lines, especially those of the medial condylar fragment. The sagittal and coronal reconstructions provide an estimation of metaphyseal 'bone loss', and the position of depressed articular fragments.
Figure 2: (a) CT scan before spanning external fixation - note the difficulty in interpretation of the CT due to overlapping femoral condyles. (b) CT scan after spanning external fixation - tibia is out to length and femoral condyle does not interfere with the interpretation of fracture configuration

Click here to view


Mustonen et al., found a 36% incidence of meniscal injury, diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in tibial plateau fractures but could not find any correlation with fracture type or amount of fracture depression. [12] Mui et al., have shown that CT scans have a high specificity with regards to ligamentous injuries in tibial plateau fractures but are poor in assessing meniscal injuries. [13] MRI scan could over-diagnose meniscal injuries. Meniscal injuries detected do not always require surgery as often these injuries are just contusions. [14]

While MRI has been shown to be sensitive in identifying meniscal and ligamentous injury in tibial condylar fractures, it is of less importance in complex bicondylar fractures than in the simpler fracture patterns.


   Definitive Treatment Top


It is not unusual for soft tissue swelling to take up to two weeks to settle enough to permit invasive surgery. As stated earlier, the use of spanning external fixation allows patient mobilization during this period, and allows for unhindered monitoring of the status of the skin.

The two broad aspects of definitive treatment are 1) restoration of the articular surface and 2) restoration of the MDD. Irrespective of the technique employed, the principles remain the same as with any other fracture surgery. The articular block is first anatomically reduced and rigidly stabilized. The metaphyseo-diaphyseal part of the fracture is dealt with by indirect reduction, providing relative stability whilst ensuring satisfactory length, alignment and rotation. This is achieved either using plate fixation or circular external fixation.

Restoration of the articular surface

Restoration of the articular surface can be accomplished by closed means in the simpler fracture patterns. However, higher energy fractures are usually associated with depressed articular fragments, and need an open reduction of the lateral condylar articular surface and screw fixation. Indirect articular reduction could be achieved by ligamentotaxis using a femoral distractor applied such that it does not interfere with intraoperative fluoroscopy and surgical field. Arthroscopy-assisted fracture reduction is useful in simpler fractures, such as partial articular fractures, [15] but fluid leakage into compartments and possibility of compartment syndrome often precludes it in higher energy fractures. There is, however, potential advantage of assessing the intra-articular structures and treating any meniscal injuries.

The anatomy of the fracture is such that the vast majority is associated with depression of the articular surface of the lateral condyle. Depressed fragments cannot be elevated by closed reduction. Some of them can be elevated by making a bone window percutaneously, and tapping with a bone impactor. The majority however need an open reduction. Direct visualization of the articular surface can be achieved by performance of a submeniscal arthrotomy, and elevating the meniscus after dividing the coronary ligament. The depressed fragments are gently disimpacted, and elevated to the level of the articular surface. The fragments are temporarily held in place with K-wires, and substituted with screws. 6.5 mm screws afford excellent grip, but there is a vogue now to use multiple smaller screws in a "raft" configuration - these are 3.5-mm or 4-mm screws, placed subchondrally. There is biomechanical evidence to suggest that a "raft" of these screws affords as good a grip as the larger screws, particularly in osteoporotic bone. [16],[17]

Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures often have bone defects due to compression of the cancellous subchondral bone. After reduction of the articular fragments, options for filling the metaphyseal bone defects include iliac crest autograft, allograft and bone substitutes such as calcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite. A randomized trial has shown calcium phosphate to have reduced subsidence rates in comparison with autograft. [18] Iliac crest autograft however continues to be the 'gold standard' and has the potential advantage of providing osteogenic, osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties, at the potential expense of donor site morbidity.

After the articular surface has been reconstructed, metaphyseal defects filled, and the fracture stabilized, the meniscus is reattached using strong absorbable sutures, in effect completing a red-on-red repair. The capsule and iliotibial band are closed, thus completing the articular reconstruction. Attention is then turned to restoration of the MDD, either with internal or external fixation.

Restoration of the metaphyseo-diaphyseal dissociation

a. Plate fixation

Double plating using one incision:
Double plate fixation through a single midline incision was common in the early days of internal fixation. However, this procedure involves significant soft tissue stripping leading to an unacceptably high incidence of infection and non-union, [19] and is hence not preferred now.

Single lateral locking plate: Biomechanical studies suggest a clinically insignificant difference in collapse of the medial condyle following fixation of experimental bicondylar fractures with a single lateral locking plate. [20] However, the direction of the fracture line in the medial condyle can vary. [21],[22] A predominantly "back to front" medial condylar fracture can be gripped adequately with locked screws from a lateral plate.

However, lateral to medial screws from a lateral locked plate cannot provide adequate purchase on an oblique fracture, or a predominantly posteromedial fracture. The literature suggests failure in restoring and maintaining alignment in about 8-13% of patients of bicondylar fractures treated with single lateral locked plates. [6],[23] Therefore, the use of a single lateral locking plate in all bicondylar fractures is likely to result in failure in certain fracture patterns due to inadequate grip of the medial fragment [[Figure 3]a and b].
Figure 3: (a) Catastrophic failure of single-plate fixation as the screws have completely missed the coronally based medial condylar fragment. (b) CT scans showing the medial tibial condylar fragment (white arrows) is not stabilized

Click here to view


Double plates with two incisions: Due to complications of a midline incision to stabilize both condyles, a double-incision approach has been used. The medial condylar fragment is stabilized first, using a posteromedial approach. [24] A one-third tubular plate, in antiglide mode, usually suffices in patients with good bone quality. Newer precontoured locked plates, specially designed for the posteromedial surface of the proximal tibia can also be used [[Figure 4]a].
Figure 4: (a) Buttress plate fixation of a large posteromedial fracture. (b) Clinical photograph of patient with fixation in Figure 4 (a), showing typical posteromedial and anterolateral incisions

Click here to view


The lateral condylar fracture is then approached through a separate anterolateral incision - the preservation of the anterior skin bridge results in a negligible risk of wound breakdown [[Figure 4]b]. Following restoration of the articular surface through open reduction and "raft" fixation [Figure 5], a lateral condylar plate is used to restore the MDD [[Figure 6]a].
Figure 5: Raft of screws for stabilization of articular block

Click here to view
Figure 6: (a) Posteromedial plate and lateral plate fixation of a bicondylar fracture. (b) Sagittal CT scan showing the apex of the posteromedial fragment which was stabilized with a posterior plate followed by lateral plate stabilization

Click here to view


While this approach seems intuitively simple, affording reduction of both fractures and preservation of soft tissue integrity, it is not free of complications. Published literature suggests a deep infection risk of about 8%, malalignment in the coronal plane in about 8%, and sagittal plane malalignment in about 20%. [25]

Plating in unusual fracture patterns: A study of the axial CT can sometimes reveal unusual fracture patterns, usually posterior or posterolateral. Specific approaches, directed to neutralize the fragment, are needed in these cases. In the presence of a large posterolateral fragment, a posterior approach to the knee provides adequate access to achieve fracture reduction and plate fixation in buttress mode [[Figure 6]b]. A variant of the posteromedial approach can be used for posteromedial fracture lines. [26] Similarly, an associated fracture of the tibial tuberosity can be stabilized with a plate and screws [Figure 7].
Figure 7: 3D CT reconstruction showing tibial tuberosity fracture. X-ray (lateral view) of knee joint with proximal half of tibia showing sequence of stabilization of this fracture - posteromedial plate, tibial tuberosity fragment stabilized with anterior plate and lateral plate

Click here to view


b. Circular frame with or without limited open reduction and screw fixation

A fine-wire circular fixator allows noninvasive reconstitution of the MDD [[Figure 8]a and b]. The technique, in experienced hands, is straightforward. The completely noninvasive nature of the procedure obviates any risk of wound breakdown. Wedge fragments of bone can be repositioned using olive wires. The security of fixation may allow earlier weight-bearing and its attendant benefits. The literature also suggests that such forms of treatment may be more beneficial for comminuted fractures. [27]
Figure 8: (a) Preoperative image intensifier pictures (antero posterior and lateral view) showing bicondylar fracture with significant comminution at the metaphyseo-diaphyseal area. (b) Same fracture stabilized with a circular frame (Taylor Spatial Frame®) after open reduction of the articular surface (® Smith and Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee)

Click here to view


Circular fixators such as an Ilizarov frame or a Taylor Spatial Frame can be repeatedly adjusted during the course of fracture healing in order to reduce gaps, and to correct the slight but significant collapse that often occurs at the metaphyseal level during fracture healing. This last feature, the capacity to fine-tune reduction of the metaphysis is probably the most important facet of treatment with a circular external fixator. In addition, there is no "footprint" on the tibia following removal of the fixator, allowing easy performance of secondary surgery should this be necessary.

However, external fixators are a definite encumbrance to the patient. There is also a definite risk of pin-site problems, [28] though this can be reduced significantly with careful pin handling, careful techniques of pin insertion and postoperative care. Pin-site infection in very proximal tibial locations can lead to septic arthritis, and it is generally recommended that the most proximal pin in the tibia should be no higher 12-15 mm from the level of the knee joint. [29]

This carries implications in the treatment of very proximal bicondylar fractures with circular external fixation - the size of the proximal fragment may mean that some of the wires in the proximal fragment are definitely intra-articular, increasing the risk of joint sepsis. A transfibular wire adds to the stability of the frame. There is potential for increased risk of septic arthritis as the proximal tibiofibular joint can communicate with the knee joint. In addition, very proximal dissociations (classically above the tibial tuberosity) often need an extension of the circular frame across the knee joint, with its attendant morbidity.

A multicentre randomized controlled trial by the Canadian Orthopedic Trauma Society showed that the advantages of circular frame included lower infection rates, less intraoperative blood loss, and a shorter hospital stay in comparison with plate fixation. Furthermore, the number of unplanned repeat surgical interventions, and their severity, was greater in the open reduction and internal fixation group. Functional outcomes were however similar to plate fixation patients at two years. Due to the higher number and severity of complications in open reduction and internal fixation, the authors were in favor of circular external fixation for these difficult-to-treat fractures. [30]

Management of associated local injuries

a. Meniscal and ligamentous injuries


Tibial bicondylar fractures are often associated with significant soft tissue swelling precluding arthroscopic or open repair of soft tissues. As discussed earlier, MRI scans of tibial bicondylar fractures show high incidence of meniscal or ligamentous injuries. However, all meniscal injuries do not require intervention. [14] If lateral plate stabilization is planned, lateral meniscal tears could be repaired at the same time. Collateral and cruciate ligament injuries can be treated non-operatively initially. Symptoms and functional requirements can be reassessed and dealt with after stabilization of the fractures.

b. Compartment syndrome

Due to the presence of significant soft tissue injuries patient should be frequently assessed for compartment syndrome both pre and post surgery. If compartment syndrome occurs prior to surgical intervention, then, release of compartments and spanning external fixation is performed. This often precludes plate fixation but definitive stabilization of fracture should be decided on fracture pattern, soft tissue status and potential for skin cover. If compartment syndrome occurs after plate stabilization, then, compartments are released and early cover of the implants may require plastic surgical care.

c. Vascular injuries

Arterial injuries are uncommon. However, when it occurs it is an emergency, requires emergency vascular repair and spanning external fixation, with this being applied in such a way that it does not interfere with positioning the patient prone. If the tibial plateau is the only injury in the limb, then arteriography in radiology suite is not essential as, in high energy tibial bicondylar injuries popliteal artery is damaged between adductor hiatus and popliteal artery trifurcation. This is due to relative immobility of popliteal artery between these two points. On-table arteriography can be performed in case of any doubt or in the presence of other associated ipsilateral limb injuries. Options for definitive treatment of fracture are then limited due to the presence of associated prophylactic fasciotomy wounds.

Outcomes following bicondylar fractures

Ideal outcome assessment would include prospective collection of data, postoperative CT scans to quantify joint incongruity and fracture reduction, long leg standing views [Figure 9] to assess mechanical axis deviation, and limb length discrepancy, as well as long-term follow-up to assess clinical and radiological features of secondary osteoarthritis. Outcomes should also include the long-term results of arthroplasty. There are no studies that have measured all these outcomes.
Figure 9: Long leg films (same case as in Figure 8) showing a healed fracture with good restoration of the mechanical axis of the limb

Click here to view


Honkonen described poor results associated with a varus malalignment of greater than 5 degrees, a valgus tilt of greater than 10 degrees, articular displacement of greater than 4 mm and condylar widening of greater than 10 mm. [31]

Following a symposium of the American Orthopedic Association, Marsh et al.,[32] reviewed the literature on articular reduction and clinical outcome of tibial plateau fractures. Functional outcomes appeared to be related more to stability of the knee joint and maintenance of alignment of the metaphysis. They concluded that there was little rationale to support the assertion that an articular step of greater than 2 mm was associated with poor outcome. [32]

Our protocol

All patients in our unit are investigated with CT scan after application of spanning external fixator, if required. We do not perform MRI investigation acutely. The protocol for the definitive management of bicondylar fractures is based on the assessment of the MDD, and the pattern of the fracture. We use circular external fixation, or plating as appropriate, based on the inherent advantages and disadvantages of each. If an associated lateral meniscal injury is identified at open reduction, it is dealt with as indicated. However, we assess the patients after they have recovered from their bony injury, to decide whether any meniscal or ligamentous injuries are present and causing functional problems.

Restoration of the articular surface, using either closed or open methods is common to both methods of treatment. Our choice of articular surface reduction is indirect with traction/ligamentotaxis and fluoroscopy control and, more commonly under direct vision under direct vision. We do not perform arthroscopy-assisted articular fracture reduction for bicondylar fractures.

Based on the fracture pattern and communition we decide whether stable internal fixation is possible. If stable internal fixation is possible and local soft tissue status permits, then, internal fixation is carried out. We have not had the need to perform additional external fixation and generally do not recommend it as it adds to the complications of both procedures - soft tissue stripping and knee stiffness.

We recognize that a circular external fixator has a higher risk of significant problems with pin-site infection if the wires are intra-articular, i.e., within 12 mm to 15 mm of the knee joint. Such a situation is likely to arise in supra-tubercular dissociations, which often need a cross-knee extension to a circular frame, with its attendant problems. The most obvious advantage of a circular frame, its capacity to fine-tune alignment of the tibia, is in cases with significant comminution at the metaphyseo-diaphyseal junction.

Plate fixation has significant benefits in terms of decreased number of outpatient visits, the avoidance of pin-site problems, and the morbidity, albeit temporary of any external fixator device. However, we also note that plate fixation has the risk of malalignment, now recognized to be one of the most important predictors of outcome of these fractures. [24] We believe that there is an increased scope for malalignment when plating comminuted fractures, which can also collapse during healing.

Fractures that are comminuted at the metaphyseo-diaphsyeal junction are also likely to be associated with poor overlying soft tissues, suggesting that a circular external fixator may be associated with lesser risks of wound breakdown. In cases suitable for plate fixation, we study the morphology of the medial condylar fragment - cases with a predominantly sagittal fracture line and minimal medial condylar comminution are treated with a single lateral locked plate.

Double plating, using two separate approaches is used for those injuries where the medial condylar fracture is more coronal than sagittal. The medial condylar fracture, usually simpler in configuration, is reduced and fixed first, thus, effectively converting the injury to a partial articular fracture. The lateral condyle is then reassembled to the rest of the tibia using a separate plate. This protocol is summarized in [Figure 10].
Figure 10: Protocol followed in the authors' institution for managing tibial bicondylar fractures

Click here to view



   Conclusion Top


Bicondylar fractures are heterogeneous injuries, with a high risk of complications of treatment. The treating surgical team should have in their armamentarium the capacity to treat these fractures with either internal or external fixation, depending on the nature of injuries. Whatever method of stabilization is chosen, the principles of stabilizing these high-energy injuries are soft tissue care, accurate articular surface reduction and maintenance, whilst achieving satisfactory length, rotation and alignment. The choice of treatment should be dictated by the soft tissues and fracture configuration.

 
   References Top

1.Lansinger O, Bergman B, Körner L, Andersson GB. Tibial condylar fractures. A twenty-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68:13-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Tscherne H, Lobenhoffer P. Tibial plateau fractures. Management and expected results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;292:87-100.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Watson JT. High-energy fractures of the tibial plateau. Orthop Clin North Am 1994; 25:723-52.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Kumar A, Whittle AP. Treatment of complex (Schatzker Type VI) fractures of the tibial plateau with circular wire external fixation: Retrospective case review. J Orthop Trauma 2000;14:339-44.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
5.Mikulak SA, Gold SM, Zinar DM. Small wire external fixation of high energy tibial plateau fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;230-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Gosling T, Schandelmaier P, Muller M, Hankemeier S, Wagner M, Krettek C. Single lateral locked screw plating of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;439:207-14.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.American College of Surgeons Committee on T. Advanced trauma life support program for doctors. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2004.   Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Egol KA, Bazzi J, McLaurin TM, Tejwani NC. The effect of knee-spanning external fixation on compartment pressures in the leg. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22:680-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
9.Sems SA, Levy BA, Dajani K, Herrera DA, Templeman DC. Incidence of deep venous thrombosis after temporary joint spanning external fixation for complex lower extremity injuries. J Trauma 2009;66:1164-6.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Egol KA, Tejwani NC, Capla EL, Wolinsky PL, Koval KJ. Staged management of high-energy proximal tibia fractures (OTA types 41): The results of a prospective, standardized protocol. J Orthop Trauma 2005;19:448-55.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
11.Giotakis N, Narayan B, Stability with unilateral external fixation in the tibia. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2007;2:13-20.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Mustonen AO, Koivikko MP, Lindahl J, Koskinen SK. MRI of acute meniscal injury associated with tibial plateau fractures: Prevalence, type, and location. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:1002-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
13.Mui LW, Engelsohn E, Umans H. Comparison of CT and MRI in patients with tibial plateau fracture: Can CT findings predict ligament tear or meniscal injury? Skeletal Radiol 2007;36:145-51.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
14.Gardner MJ, Yacoubian S, Geller D, Suk M, Mintz D, Potter H, et al. The incidence of soft tissue injury in operative tibial plateau fractures: A magnetic resonance imaging analysis of 103 patients. J Orthop Trauma 2005;19:79-84.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
15.Lubowitz JH, Elson WS, Guttmann D. Part I: Arthroscopic management of tibial plateau fractures. Arthroscopy 2004;20:1063-70.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
16.Westmoreland GL, McLaurin TM, Hutton WC. Screw pullout strength: A biomechanical comparison of large-fragment and small-fragment fixation in the tibial plateau. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:178-81.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
17.Patil S, Mahon A, Green S, McMurtry I, Port A. A biomechanical study comparing a raft of 3.5 mm cortical screws with 6.5 mm cancellous screws in depressed tibial plateau fractures. Knee 2006;13:231-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Russell TA, Leighton RK. Comparison of autogenous bone graft and endothermic calcium phosphate cement for defect augmentation in tibial plateau fractures. A multicenter, prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:2057-61.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Young MJ, Barrack RL. Complications of internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures. Orthop Rev 1994;23:149-54.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]    
20.Higgins TF, Klatt J, Bachus KN. Biomechanical analysis of bicondylar tibial plateau fixation: How does lateral locking plate fixation compare to dual plate fixation? J Orthop Trauma 2007;21:301-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
21.Higgins TF, Kemper D, Klatt J. Incidence and morphology of the posteromedial fragment in bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2009;23:45-51.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
22.Barei DP, O'Mara TJ, Taitsman LA, Dunbar RP, Nork SE. Frequency and fracture morphology of the posteromedial fragment in bicondylar tibial plateau fracture patterns. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22:176-82.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
23.Phisitkul P, McKinley TO, Nepola JV, Marsh JL. Complications of locking plate fixation in complex proximal tibia injuries. J Orthop Trauma 2007;21:83-91.  Back to cited text no. 23
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
24.Weil YA, Gardner MJ, Boraiah S, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Posteromedial supine approach for reduction and fixation of medial and bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22:357-62.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
25.Barei DP, Nork SE, Mills WJ, Henley MB, Benirschke SK. Complications associated with internal fixation of high-energy bicondylar tibial plateau fractures utilizing a two-incision technique. J Orthop Trauma 2004;18:649-57.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
26.Fakler JK, Ryzewicz M, Hartshorn C, Morgan SJ, Stahel PF, Smith WR. Optimizing the management of Moore type I postero-medial split fracture dislocations of the tibial head: Description of the Lobenhoffer approach. J Orthop Trauma 2007;21:330-6.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
27.Claes L, Heitemeyer U, Krischak G, Braun H, Hierholzer G. Fixation technique influences osteogenesis of comminuted fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;365:221-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
[PUBMED]    
28.Hutson JJ Jr. Zych GA. Infections in periarticular fractures of the lower extremity treated with tensioned wire hybrid fixators. J Orthop Trauma 1998;12:214-8.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Stavlas P, Polyzois D. Septic arthritis of the major joints of the lower limb after periarticular external fixation application: Are conventional safe corridors enough to prevent it? Injury 2005;36:239-47.  Back to cited text no. 29
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
30.Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Open reduction and internal fixation compared with circular fixator application for bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:2613-23.  Back to cited text no. 30
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
31.Honkonen SE. Indications for surgical treatment of tibial condyle fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;302:199-205.  Back to cited text no. 31
[PUBMED]    
32.Marsh JL, Buckwalter J, Gelberman R, Dirschl D, Olson S, Brown T, et al. Articular fractures: Does an anatomic reduction really change the result? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:1259-71.  Back to cited text no. 32
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  

Top
Correspondence Address:
Badri Narayan
Department of Orthopedics, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, L7 8XP
United Kingdom
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.77130

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10]

This article has been cited by
1 Proximal tibial fractures with impending compartment syndrome managed by fasciotomy and internal fixation A retrospective analysis of 15 cases
Naveen Sharma,Varun Singh,Ashish Agrawal,Rakesh Bhargava
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2015; 49(5): 502
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Treatment of Complex Proximal Tibial Fractures (TypesV & VI of Schautzker Classification) by Double Plate Fixation with Single Anterior Incision
Ebrahim Ghayem Hassankhani,Farzad Omidi Kashani,Golnaz Ghayem Hassankhani
Open Journal of Orthopedics. 2013; 03(04): 208
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Comparative study of internal and hybrid external fixation in tibial condylar fractures
A. Malakasi,S. N. Lallos,E. Chronopoulos,D. S. Korres,N. E. Efstathopoulos
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology. 2013; 23(1): 97
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


 
    Abstract
    Introduction
    Evolution of Tre...
    Considerations i...
    Initial Treatment
    Further Investig...
    Definitive Treatment
    Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed10011    
    Printed212    
    Emailed5    
    PDF Downloaded584    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal