Neurobionplus
Home About Journal AHEAD OF PRINT Current Issue Back Issues Instructions Submission Search Subscribe Blog    
Login 

Users Online: 671 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
 


 
 Table of Contents    
EBM TIPS  
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 45  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 103-104
Three-minute critical appraisal of a case series article


McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication26-Feb-2011
 

How to cite this article:
Chan K, Bhandari M. Three-minute critical appraisal of a case series article. Indian J Orthop 2011;45:103-4

How to cite this URL:
Chan K, Bhandari M. Three-minute critical appraisal of a case series article. Indian J Orthop [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Dec 14];45:103-4. Available from: http://www.ijoonline.com/text.asp?2011/45/2/103/77126
Case series represents an observational study that reports on data from a subject group without a comparison population. [1] In the hierarchy of evidence, it represents level IV evidence. [2],[3] This is due to lack of control subjects, making case series prone to bias. However, there is a substantial proportion of clinical studies that are case series in the medical literature, [2],[3] emphasising the importance of understanding its advantages and disadvantages. The following article explores the role of case series and examines the features of a well-designed study.


   Key Criteria for Critical Appraisal Top


Case series are often used to describe outcomes of novel treatments. The information gained can be used to generate hypotheses that lead to focussed studies of a stronger design. [2] They are also helpful in refining new techniques or treatment protocols before they are studied in more advanced trials. [2] The biggest advantage is that case series are feasible study designs, are easy to conduct and require less time and financial resources than randomised-controlled trials, case-control, or cohort studies. [2] However, readers need to be conscientious of the inherent biases in case series, particularly selection bias. A poorly designed case series can have severe limitations in their conclusions. There are several key criteria that constitute a high-quality case series [Table 1].
Table 1: The three-minute checklist

Click here to view


First, the study should have clear objectives with a well-defined, a priori study protocol. [2] There should be consecutive patient enrollment and the inclusion and exclusion criteria should be explicitly stated. [2] The time horizon or the duration of participant selection (including follow up period) should be stated up front as well. These study characteristics will help limit selection bias. Second, the outcome measures should be clinically relevant and collected prospectively. [2] Ideally, the use of health-related quality of life measures will help strengthen the value of the case series. Finally, a high follow-up rate is imperative. [2] If a large number of patients are dropping out of a study, the validity of the treatment or study protocol must be questioned. Unfortunately, even the best designed clinical trials can lose patients to follow-up. In such situations, it is important that the authors state the reasons for the loss to follow-up.

The study by Bravo [3] provides a good illustration of a well-designed case series. This study looked at the outcomes of proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty using a relatively new prosthesis called pyrolytic carbon implants. The authors attempted to limit bias by stating explicit details about surgical indications and contraindications for arthroplasty, as well as the surgical technique and postoperative therapy employed for all study participants. They enrolled consecutive patients and clearly specified the duration of recruitment of participants. Furthermore, the authors examined important patient outcomes such as range of motion, pain, satisfaction, and grip strength. To be critical though, the use of a validated, quality of life measurement tool would be more ideal, such as the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. Finally, there were essentially no patients loss to follow-up, with the exception of one, who unfortunately died during the study period.


   Summary Top


In conclusion, a case series can be prone to bias, limiting its generalisability to larger populations of patients. However, a well-designed case series can provide information that allows hypotheses to develop, leading to further advanced studies. It is important for readers to recognise the advantages and disadvantages of case series.[4]

 
   References Top

1.Gordis L. Epidemiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc; 2004.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Bhandari M, Joensson A. Clinical Research for Surgeons. Germany: Thieme Publishing Group; 2009.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Degan RM, Hodgins JL, Bhandari M. The language of evidence based medicine: Answers to common questions? Indian J Orthop 2008;42:111-25.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Bravo CJ, Rizzo M, Hormel KB, Beckenbaugh RD. Pyrolytic carbon proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty: Results with minimum two-year follow-up evaluation. J Hand Surg Am 2007;32:1-11.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  

Top
Correspondence Address:
Mohit Bhandari
2309 Hoover Court, Hamilton, L7P 4V2, Ontario
Canada
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.77126

Rights and Permissions



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Closed treatment of unilateral mandibular condyle fractures in adults: a systematic review
A.V.J. Rozeboom,L. Dubois,R.R.M. Bos,R. Spijker,J. de Lange
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2017; 46(4): 456
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Evidence for the treatment of co-occurring stuttering and speech sound disorder: A clinical case series
Rachael Unicomb,Sally Hewat,Elizabeth Spencer,Elisabeth Harrison
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2017; 19(3): 251
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Efficacy and safety profile of linezolid in the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Akosua Adom Agyeman,Richard Ofori-Asenso
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials. 2016; 15(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 A principal component analysis is conducted for a case series quality appraisal checklist
Bing Guo,Carmen Moga,Christa Harstall,Don Schopflocher
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2016; 69: 199
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Exploration of clinical changes following a novel mobilisation technique for treatment of chronic low back pain: A single cohort design
Gail C. Hanson,Bruce Jones,Catherine J. Bacon,Robert W. Moran
Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2016; 20(3): 571
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Distinguishing the Signals From the Noise: Can Epidemiologic Studies Inform Our Understanding of Glomerular Disease?
Michelle M. O’Shaughnessy,Susan L. Hogan
American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2016; 68(4): 503
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Assessing the utility of serum C-telopeptide cross-link of type 1 collagen as a predictor of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw
Reyes Enciso,Jill Keaton,Nadia Saleh,Azadeh Ahmadieh,Glenn T. Clark,Parish P. Sedghizadeh
The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2016; 147(7): 551
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Editorial
K. Harish,A. S. Kirthi Koushik
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2015; 6(2): 93
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Motor imagery reinforces brain compensation of reach-to-grasp movement after cervical spinal cord injury
Sébastien Mateo,Franck Di Rienzo,Vance Bergeron,Aymeric Guillot,Christian Collet,Gilles Rode
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 2015; 9
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Quality of reporting of the literature on gastrointestinal reflux after repair of esophageal atresia–tracheoesophageal fistula
Anna C. Shawyer,Julia Pemberton,David Kanters,Amar A.A. Alnaqi,Helene Flageole
Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for patients with acute respiratory failure secondary to the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review
Marianne Fitzgerald,Jonathan Millar,Bronagh Blackwood,Andrew Davies,Stephen J Brett,Daniel F McAuley,James J McNamee
Critical Care. 2014; 18(3): 222
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Sources and quality of literature addressing femoroacetabular impingement
Olufemi R. Ayeni,Kevin Chan,Jamal Al-Asiri,Teresa Chien,Sheila Sprague,Susan Liew,Mohit Bhandari
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2013; 21(2): 415
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 The optimal treatment of type II and III odontoid fractures in the elderly: a systematic review
Jeroen G. J. Huybregts,Wilco C. H. Jacobs,Carmen L. A. M. Vleggeert-Lankamp
European Spine Journal. 2013; 22(1): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


 
    Key Criteria for...
    Summary
    References
    Article Tables
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3780    
    Printed137    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded135    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 13    

Recommend this journal