Neurobionplus
Home About Journal AHEAD OF PRINT Current Issue Back Issues Instructions Submission Search Subscribe Blog    
Login 

Users Online: 498 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 44  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 79-83

Outcome analysis of pelvic ring fractures


Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Correspondence Address:
Lokesh A Veerappa
#38, III Cross, I Stage, III Block, Nagarabhavi, Bangalore - 560 072
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.58610

Rights and Permissions

Background: The behavior of pelvic ring fractures in the long run has been very sparsely studied. The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term outcome of pelvic ring fractures. Materials and Methods: A total of 24 patients with pelvic ring fractures, not involving the acetabulum, were followed up for an average duration of 33 months (range 24-49 months). The clinicoradiological assessment was done using the pelvic scoring system adapted from Cole et al. Parameters assessed included sacroiliac (SI) joint involvement and, among SI joint injuries, the presence of a fracture disruption and the degree of displacement. Results: Pain and limp were present in 13 patients (54.2%) each and residual working disability in 9 patients (37.5%). The overall Cole's pelvic score was 31.3 ± 7.02 of a total score of 40. The average pelvic score in patients with SI disruption was 29.2 ± 6.75; much lower than patients without SI disruption with an average score of 34.9 ± 6.25 reaching statistical significance. The pelvic score among patients with a displacement ≤10 mm was 33.0 ± 3.92 and with a displacement >10 mm 25.88 ± 7.14. The difference was statistically significant. Conclusions: Pelvic ring injuries can lead to long term problems significantly. The involvement of the SI joint affects the long-term outcome adversely, more so if the residual displacement is >10 mm. The pelvic scoring system is comprehensive and depicts subtle differences in the outcome, which the individual parameters of the assessment fail to show.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3459    
    Printed199    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded278    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 9    

Recommend this journal