| |
|
|
| Year : 2010 | Volume
: 44
| Issue : 1 | Page : 28-34 |
|
| The evaluation of short fusion in idiopathic scoliosis |
|
|
Wiwat Wajanavisit1, Patarawan Woratanarat1, Thira Woratanarat2, Kitti Aroonjaruthum1, Noratep Kulachote1, Wajana Leelapatana3, Wichien Laohacharoensombat1
1 Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand
2 Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
3 Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand
Click here for correspondence address and email
| Date of Web Publication | 31-Dec-2009 |
|
|
 |
|
 Abstract | | |
Background: Selective thoracic fusion in type II curve has been recommended by King et al. since 1983. They suggested that care must be taken to use the vertebra that is neutral and stable so that the lower level of fusion is centered over the sacrum. Since then there has been the trend to do shorter and selective fusion of the major curve. This study was conducted to find out whether short posterior pedicle instrumentation alone could provide efficient correction and maintain trunk balance comparing to the anterior instrumentation.
Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted during 2005-2007 on 39 consecutive cases with idiopathic scoliosis cases King 2 and 3 (Lenke 1A, 1B), 5C and miscellaneous. Only the major curve was instrumented unless both curves were equally rigid and of the same magnitude. The level of fusion was planned as the end vertebra (EVB) to EVB fusion, although minor adjustment was modified by the surgeons intraoperatively. The most common fusion levels in major thoracic curves were T6-T12, whereas the most common fusion levels in the thoraco-lumbar curves were T10-L3. Fusion was performed from the posterior only approach and the implants utilized were uniformly plate and pedicle screw system. All the patients were followed at least 2 years till skeletal maturity. The correction of the curve were assessed according to type of curve (lenke IA, IB and 5), severity of curve (less than 450, 450-890 and more than 900), age at surgery (14 or less and 15 or more) and number of the segment involved in instrumentation (fusion level less than curve, fusion level as of the curve and fusion more than the curve)
Results: The average long-term curve correction for the thoracic was 40.4% in Lenke 1A, 52.2% in Lenke 1B and 56.3% in Lenke 5. The factors associated with poorer outcome were younger age at surgery (<11 years or Risser 0), fusion at wrong levels (shorter than the measured end vertebra) and rigid curve identified by bending study. However, all patients had significant improved trunk balance and coronal hump at the final assessment at maturity. Two patients underwent late extension fusion because of junctional scoliosis.
Conclusions: With modern instrumentations, the EVB of the major curve can be used at the end of the instrumentation in most cases of idiopathic scoliosis. In those cases with either severe trunk shift, younger than 11 years old, or extreme rigid curve, an extension of one or more levels might be safer. In particular situations, the concept of centering the lowest vertebra over the sacrum should be adopted. Keywords: Idiopathic scoliosis, short fusion, selective posterior fusion, pedicle screw and plate fixation
How to cite this article:
Wajanavisit W, Woratanarat P, Woratanarat T, Aroonjaruthum K, Kulachote N, Leelapatana W, Laohacharoensombat W. The evaluation of short fusion in idiopathic scoliosis. Indian J Orthop 2010;44:28-34 |
How to cite this URL:
Wajanavisit W, Woratanarat P, Woratanarat T, Aroonjaruthum K, Kulachote N, Leelapatana W, Laohacharoensombat W. The evaluation of short fusion in idiopathic scoliosis. Indian J Orthop [serial online] 2010 [cited 2019 Dec 8];44:28-34. Available from: http://www.ijoonline.com/text.asp?2010/44/1/28/58603 |
| Introduction | |  |
Selective thoracic fusion in type II curve has been recommended by King et al, [1] since 1983. They suggested that care must be taken to use the vertebra that is neutral and stable so that the lower level of fusion is centered over the sacrum. Yukihiro M et al, [2] in 2006 defined the predicted stable vertebra (PSV) that was centered over the sacrum on traction roentgenogram. Luk et al, [3] selected the lower level by their technique of fulcrum bending (FB). These authors concluded they could save one or more motion segments comparing to the previous reports. Since 2001, the Lenke system of classification has been popularized as an accurate mean to determine which vertebrae should be fused. [4] This classification system requires analysis of the upright coronal and sagittal radiographs along with the supine side bending radiographic views. The triad classification system consists of a curve type (1-6), a lumbar spine modifier (A, B, C), and a sagittal thoracic modifier (-, N, +). All three regions of the radiographic coronal and sagittal planes, the proximal thoracic, main thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar are designated as either the major curve (largest Cobb measurement) or minor curves, which are categorized into structural and nonstructural types. The recommendations are that the major and structural minor curves are included in the instrumentation and fusion, and the nonstructural minor curves are excluded.
However, in 2004, Lenke and associates reported satisfactory results for selective thoracic fusion in 44 cases with main thoracic and the minor lumbar C modifier curves. [5] Many authors advocated selective short anterior fusion in thoracolumbar and thoracic curves by various methods. [6],[7],[8],[9],[10] These general trends to limit the fusion segments in idiopathic scoliosis are the basis and rationale for this study in order to find out whether short posterior pedicle instrumentation alone could provide efficient correction and maintain trunk balance.
| Materials and Methods | | |
A prospective study of idiopathic scoliosis cases with a King 2 and 3 (Lenke 1A, 1B) and the thoracolumbar curve in Lenke 5 during 2005-2007 was conducted. The inclusion criteria comprised idiopathic juvenile and adolescent scoliosis, 9-20 years of age, and complete follow-up data with standing X-rays at 2 years or more post-operation. The exclusion criteria were all other types of scoliosis, patients declining to undergo selective short instrumentation at the thoracic (T) and thoracolumbar (TL) levels utilizing the pedicle screws and plates (Ramathibodi spinal system Manufactured by: T.K.S. Metal Works LTD, 2 soi Bangwag,16;Bangwag,Pasicharoen,Bangkok 10160,Thailand).
Fusion was performed from the posterior only approach and the implants utilized were uniformly plate and pedicle screw system. Only the major curve was instrumented unless both curves were equally rigid and of the same magnitude. The level of fusion was planned as the end vertebra (EVB) to EVB fusion, although minor adjustment was modified by the surgeons intraoperatively. All the patients were followed at least for 2 years till skeletal maturity.
Since 1990, the de-rotation technique of correction of scoliosis has been routinely adopted in Ramathibodi Hospital by pedicle plates and screws. In 2005, a series of 25 cases was analyzed to evaluate the efficacy of apical de-rotation. [11] In these cases, the selection of levels of fusion was based on the balanced vertebrae at the upper and caudal end of the curve. These cases were regarded as the control for this study.
Preoperative and the last follow-up Cobb's angle measurement was recorded by two chief residents, the average figure was recorded. Patients with a plump line deviation of more than 1.5 cm were recorded as imbalanced posture. Any complications or revisions were also recorded. The correction of the curve was assessed as type of curve (Lenke IA, IB and 5), severity of curve (less than 45°, 45°-89° and more than 90°), age at surgery (14 years or less and 15 years or more) and number of the segment involved in instrumentation (fusion level less than curve, fusion level as of the curve and fusion more than the curve)
Student t-test was used to evaluate the efficacy of curve correction between pairs of variables. One-way analysis of variance was performed for more than two-group comparison of continuous data. All statistical analyses were done by using STATA 10.0 (STATA Corp, Texas).
| Results | | |
There were 43 cases that underwent apical de-rotation during the period of study. Thirty-nine cases met the criteria of short selective instrumentation of the major curve. Analysis of the preoperative and the last postoperative Cobb's angle were shown in [Table 1]. The patient's mean age at the time of surgery was 14.7 years (range 9 to 20 years). The mean follow-up is 2.1 years (range 0.8 to 3 years). The distributions of the curve as classified by Lenke were as follows: 1A (n = 12), 1B (n = 10), 5C (n = 10) and miscellaneous (n = 7). The average pre-operative Cobb's angle was 52.8° and the average final post-operative Cobb's angle was 25.4°. The residual Cobb's angle is 48.11% when compared with pre-operatively. This degree of correction was inferior to our previous study [12] by using the balanced vertebrae as the end of instrumentation (48 versus 59%).
Factors affecting the surgical outcome
1) Curve magnitude
The patients with curve larger than 90° had significantly poorer results when compared with those of smaller curve. The mean value of correction in the coronal plane for group I (n = 17) (<45°) was 48%, group II (n = 16) (45°-89°) was 54%, and group III (n = 6) (>90°) was 39% respectively. The P-value between group III and group I was 0.009 and between group III and group II was 0.0015, respectively.
2) Age at surgery
Those patients underwent surgery at the age below 14 years (n = 21) ended up with poorer results than those over 15 years of age (n = 18). The amount of correction in the younger age group was 43.5%, whereas those older age group was 53.0% [Table 2]. The P -value between both groups
3) The number of vertebral segments involved in the instrumentation unit was shown in [Table 3]. There were 22 short fusion cases involving 1-2 levels of vertebral segments lesser than the vertebral segments involved in the curve. Fourteen cases involved the same number whilst 7 cases involving 1-2 more vertebral segments. The mean corrections in coronal plane were 48.85, 48.88 and 45.41%, respectively. There was no significant statistical difference.
4) Lenke's type and curve correction
According to [Table 1], the numbers of cases with short fusion, in decreasing order, were 1A (12 cases), 1B (10 cases), 5 (12 cases) and miscellaneous (7 cases). The percentages of curve correction were 40.4, 52.2, 56.5 and 46.1, respectively. There was significant difference between the Lenke 1A group and Lenke 5 group (P = 0.008), whereas no significant difference in the Lenke 1A and 1B group was observed (P = 0.135). Examples of case from pre-operative to post-operative conditions were shown in [Figure 1]a,[Figure 2],[Figure 3],[Figure 4]b.
Complications
There was one case with late infection requiring implants removal (case #37 of [Table 1]). The curve was still stable after the implant was removed.
There were two cases where the progressive curve at the lower junction necessitated revision. One belonged to the 1B group (case #22) and the other in 3C group (case #37 of [Table 1]).
| Discussion | | |
Surgeons performing scoliosis surgery usually encounter two basic questions. Firstly, whether or not all the structural curves should be fused. Secondly, how many vertebral segments should be included in the fusion construct? To address the first question, most surgeons agree that both double major curves should be fused. Through Lenke's meticulous 3D classification, [4] he advocated to include minor structural curves in the fusion mass. His recommendation is widely adopted, although with modern fixation devices, there is a general trend to do selective fusion over the major curve only. Based on our limited data, it seemed that short fusion over the thoraco-lumbar curve in Lenke 5C type of curve, comparing to Lenke 1A, did well in light of degrees of curve correction and trunk balance [Table 1] and [Table 2].
In addition, by comparing with our previous series, it seemed that EVB to EVB fusion or less did poorer than utilizing the balanced vertebrae as the end of the fusion mass (curve correction of 48% against 59%). However, we could not demonstrate the difference in degree of curve correction among cases with longer or shorter than EVB to EVB instrumentation in the present series [Table 3]. Instead, we found strong associations of the degree of curve correction with curve magnitude, Lenke's type and the age at surgery, although the latter was not as strong as the formers.
By comparing to anterior instrumentation, Burton et al, [12] found that the posterior pedicle instrumentations were also effective in terms of the degrees of curve correction, balance and number of the vertebrae instrumented. Halm et al, [13] and Monney and Kaelin [14] had also reported excellent result in short posterior instrumentation for thoraco-lumbar scoliosis. They achieved about 64% correction of the major curve. In our series, we got 56% correction in the Lenke 5C group. Most of our cases had the fusion ended at EVB-1, one level less than the recommendation given by the authors. Yang and Chen [15] warned for attention of proximal kyphosis if the proximal junction had the kyphotic angle of more than 10 degrees. However, we had not encountered this problem.
Regarding the major thoracic curve, Betz et al, [16] reported that an average of 2.5 lumbar levels can be saved with anterior instrumentation. Suk et al, [17] achieved 61% correction in selective thoracic fusion. They found that the adding-on phenomena occurred in patients who were fused two levels short of the neutral vertebra. This was also our experience and we included our postoperative Cobb measurement to the farthest add-on vertebra. Hamzaoglu et al, [18] used intraoperative halo-femoral traction in those cases of severe thoracic scoliosis (>100 degrees) and could get an average curve correction of 51%. In our series, we got only 39% correction in this particular group. It seems that we need some additional procedures for this kind of problems.
| Conclusion | | |
Short fusion can be safely performed in Lenke 5C type of curvature. Short EVB to EVB fusion can be an option in those patients with flexible moderate thoracic curve when the patient's age reaches puberty. Those cases with severe rigid thoracic curve, the concept of neutral vertebra as the base of fusion should be adopted.
| References | | |
| 1. | King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, Winter RB. The selection of fusion level in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;65:1302-13.  [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
| 2. | Yukihiro M, Noriaki K, Koji S. The selection of fusion level in Idiopathic scoliosis: Is the predicted stable vertebra the best determinant of distal fusion level? Spinal Deformity 1999;14:129-35. |
| 3. | Luk KD, Don AS, Chong CS, Wong YW, Cheueng KM. Selection of fusion levels in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using flcrum study. Spine 2008;339:2192-8. |
| 4. | Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:1169-81. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
| 5. | Edwards CC 2nd, Lenke LG, Peele M, Sides B, Rinella A, Bridwell KH. Selective thoracic fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with C modifier, Radiographic and clinical results. Spine 2004;29:536-46. |
| 6. | Moe JH, Purcell GA, Bradford DS. Zilke instrumentation (VDS) for the correction of spinal curvature: Analysis of results in 66 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983;180:133-53. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
| 7. | Kaneda K, Shono Y, Satoh S, Abumi K. New anterior instrumentation for the management of the thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis: Application of the Kaneda two-rod system. Spine 1996;21:1250-61. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
| 8. | Bernstein RM, Hall JE. Solid rod short segment anterior fusion in thoracolumbar scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop B 1998;7:124-31. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
| 9. | Kamimura M, Ebara S, Kinoshita T, Itoh H, Nakakohji T, Takaoka K, et al. Anterior surgery with short fusion using the Zilke procedure for thoracic scoliosis: Focus on the correction of compensatory curves. Spinal Diord 1999;12:451-60. |
| 10. | Han IH, Chin DK, Kim KS. Short segment correction adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2008;44:52-6. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
| 11. | Laohacharoensombat W, Jaovisidha S, Wajanavisit W, Suppaphol S. Apical derotation in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. J Med Assoc Thai 2005;88:58-64. |
| 12. | Burton DC, Asher MA, Lai SM. Patient-based outcomes, analysis of patients with single torsion thoracolumbar-lumbar scoliosis treated with anterior or posterior instrumentation: An average 5-to 9-year follow-up study. Spine 2002;27:2363-7. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
| 13. | Halm H, Niemeyer T, Liljenqvis U. Segmental pedicle screw instrumentation in idiopathic thosacolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2000;9:191-7. |
| 14. | Money G, Kaelin AJ. Short posterior fusion for patients with thoracolumbar idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;364:32-9. |
| 15. | Yang SH, Chen PQ. Proximal kyphosis after short posterior fusion for thoracolumbar kyphosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;411:152-8. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
| 16. | Betz RR, Harms J, Clements DH 3 rd , Lenke LG, Lowe TG, Shufflebarger HL, et al. Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:225-39. |
| 17. | Suk SI, Lee SM, Chung ER, Kim JH, Kim SS. Selective thoracic fusion with segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: More than 5-year follow-up. Spine 2005;30:1602-9. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
| 18. | Hamzaoglu A, Ozturk C, Aydogan M, Tezer M, Aksu N, Bruno MB. Posterior only pedicle screw instrumentation with intraoperative halo-femoral traction in the surgical treatment of severe scoliosis (>100 degrees). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;339:979-83. |
Correspondence Address:
Wichien Laohacharoensombat
Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400
Thailand
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.58603
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3] |
|
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Cobb-1 versus cobb-to-cobb anterior fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke 5C curves: a radiological comparative study |
|
| Arnaud Dubory,Lotfi Miladi,Brice Ilharreborde,Jean-Marie Gennari,Jihane Rouissi,Christophe Glorion,Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette,Thierry Odent | | European Spine Journal. 2017; 26(6): 1711 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
Apical derotation for deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the pedicle screw-plate spinal system: Surgical technique and results |
|
| Chanplakorn, P., Wajanavisit, W., Laohacharoensombat, W. | | Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2011; 26(3): 203-211 | | [Pubmed] | | | 3 |
Scoliosis - The current concepts |
|
| Sengupta, D.K., Webb, J. | | Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2010; 44(1): 5-8 | | [Pubmed] | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Article Access Statistics | | | Viewed | 2388 | | | Printed | 160 | | | Emailed | 3 | | | PDF Downloaded | 145 | | | Comments | [Add] | | | Cited by others | 3 | | |
|
|
