Neurobionplus
Home About Journal AHEAD OF PRINT Current Issue Back Issues Instructions Submission Search Subscribe Blog    
Login 

Users Online: 3010 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
 


 
LETTER TO EDITOR Table of Contents   
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 42  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 231-232
Routine chemoprophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis in Indian patients: Is it really justified?


1 Department of Orthopaedics, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Orthopaedics, Aruna Asaf Ali Govt. Hospital, Rajpur Road, New Delhi, India

Click here for correspondence address and email
 

How to cite this article:
Maini L, Sharma H. Routine chemoprophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis in Indian patients: Is it really justified?. Indian J Orthop 2008;42:231-2

How to cite this URL:
Maini L, Sharma H. Routine chemoprophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis in Indian patients: Is it really justified?. Indian J Orthop [serial online] 2008 [cited 2019 Oct 17];42:231-2. Available from: http://www.ijoonline.com/text.asp?2008/42/2/231/40265
Sir,

We read with interest the article "Routine chemoprophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis in Indian patients: is it really justified?". We differ with the observations made by the authors. [1]

Firstly, the incidence mentioned by the authors i.e. 7.2% is significant according to us and requires more than just close monitoring.

Secondly, there are quite a few studies in the Indian literature contrary to the authors' observation. They might not be accessible on Pubmed and hence were not mentioned by the authors. We could find out quite a few studies in the Indian literature/on Indian patients with an incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) higher than that reported in this study. Shead, [2] Nagi, [3] Sharma, [4] Rajgopalan N, [5] Bhan, [6] Maini [7] reported incidences of 28%, 8%, 19.6%, 23.3%, 7.8%, 9.9% respectively. Various published studies from Agarwala [8],[9],[10] showed incidences of 54%, 34.4% and 43.2% with prophylaxis and 60% without prophylaxis. Rajgopalan, Agarwala and Maini used low molecular weight heparin for prophylaxis. Shead used 125 fibrinogen uptake to determine the incidence of deep vein thrombosis. Shead, Nagi and Sharma used no prophylaxis and Bhan's is the subgroup which received no prophylaxis.

Here we would also like to draw attention to certain points in the study published which could have affected the final outcome. The average age in this study was though 60 years for males (range 25-90 years) and 62 years for females (29-94 years), but the range is very wide. Age has beyond doubt proved to be a significant factor in the development of deep vein thrombosis. The incidence of venous thromboembolism increases exponentially with age. Age is additive to other factors for thromboembolism. Age is also a risk factor independent of other risk factors. [11] The inclusion of young patients less than 40 years of age might also have been one of the reasons for low incidence of deep vein thrombosis in this study.

Another reason according to us is the miscellaneous surgeries (29, i.e. 23% of the total surgeries). The interlocking nail femur/tibia constituted 11 (8.8%) and other surgeries were 18 (14.4%). We are not sure how many of these were acetabular surgeries, (one patient who underwent acetabular reconstruction developed DVT) and what percentage of surgeries involved was ankle and knee trauma surgeries. Joint replacement and hip fracture surgery definitely have a higher incidence of DVT compared to other lower limb trauma surgeries. [11]

Distal deep vein thrombosis may look benign as mentioned by the authors. The contradictory evidence from various studies has suggested that isolated calf vein thrombi may propagate rapidly and fatal pulmonary embolism from isolated calf vein DVT is a significant risk. [10]

 
   References Top

1.Mavalankar AP, Majmundar D, Rani S. Routine chemoprophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis in Indian patients: Is it really justified? Indian J Orthop 2007;41:188-93.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Shead GV, Narayanan R. Incidence of post operative venous thromboembolism in South India. Br J Surg 1980;67:813-4.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  
3.Nagi ON, Dhillon MS, Katariya S, Meyeeb SM. Deep vein thrombosis after major surgery-evaluation by compression ultrasonography. Indian J Orthop 1999;33:200-3.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Sharma H, Maini L, Agarwal N, Upadhyay A, Viswanath J, Dhaon BK. Incidence of deep vein thrombosis in patients with fracture around hip joint: A prospective study. Indian J Orthop 2002;36:157-9.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Rajgopalan N. Thromboprophylaxis by delteparen sodium in elective major orthopaedic surgery. A multicentric Indian study. Indian J Orthop 2003;37:158-61.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Bhan S, Dhaon BK, Gulati Y, Aggawal S. Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis: A multicentric study. Indian J Orthop 2004;38:178-82.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Maini PS, Talwar N, Nijhawan VK, Dhawan M. Results of cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for fracture of femoral neck-10 year study. Indian J Orthop 2006;40:154-6.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Agarwala S, Wadhwani R, Modhe JM, Bhagwat AS. Screening of deep venous thrombosis in post operative orthopaedic patient: Comparison of color Doppler ultrasound and contrast venography. Indian J Orthop 2002;36:153-6.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Agarwala S, Bhagat A, Modhe J, Dastur FD, Patil S. Incidence of deep vein thrombosis in Indian patients: A prospective study in 104 patients. Indian J Orthop 2003;37:159-62.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Agarwala S, Bhagat AS, Wadhwani R. Pre and post operative DVT in Indian patients: Efficacy of LMWH as a prophylactic agent. Indian J Orthop 2005;39:55-8.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Parakh R, Somaya A, Todi SK, Iyenger SS. Consensus development recommendations for the role of LMWHs in prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism: An Indian prospective. J Assoc Physicians India 2007;55:5-30.  Back to cited text no. 11    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Lalit Maini
22, Samachar Apartments, Mayur Vihar, Phase I, New Delhi - 110 092
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.40265

Rights and Permissions



This article has been cited by
1 Authorsę reply
Mavalankar, A.P., Majmundar, D., Rani, S.
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2008; 42(2): 232-233
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
   
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


 
    References
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3024    
    Printed91    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded281    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal