| Abstract|| |
Objective: Patients often reach the hospital late after passage of golden hours (initial 6 hours) after sustaining high-velocity injuries. The decision of internal fixation in Gustilo's Type IIIA and IIIB fractures becomes a formidable challenge in patients reaching late. The purpose of the present study was to find out if internal fixation could be safely undertaken in these patients.
Materials and Methods: Sixty-three patients, having 70 compound fractures (46 Type IIIA and 24 IIIB), which were internally fixed after 6h but within 24h after injury, were included in the present analysis. Follow-up ranged from 18 to 48 months with mean of 28 months.
Result: Overall infection rate noted was (n = 11) 15.71% (8.7% in IIIA, and 29.16% in IIIB). The difference in deep infection rate between Type IIIA and Type IIIB was found to be statistically significant ( P value < 0.01). Nonunion was seen in five fractures. Functional evaluation using Katenjian's criteria, showed 62.85% (44 fractures of 70) good to excellent results.
Conclusion: Satisfactory results may be obtained in Gustilo's Type IIIA and IIIB fractures even if fixed after the golden period, provided strict protocol such as aggressive debridement, prophylactic antibiotic coverage, early soft tissue reconstruction and timely bone grafting is followed. The primary coverage of the wound is discouraged.
Keywords: Early internal fixation, Gustilo′s type III fractures, golden period
|How to cite this article:|
Azam Q, Sherwani M, Abbas M, Gupta R, Asif N, Sabir A B. Internal fixation in compound type III fractures presenting after golden period. Indian J Orthop 2007;41:204-8
The aim of fracture treatment is the return of the injured extremity to full function in the shortest period of time. Factors such as contamination of wound, major bone or skin loss and nerve or tendon injuries often associated with Gustilo's compound Type III fractures make this a challenging task. The incidence of infection in cases of intramedullary nailing after external fixator removal is noted to be high.  The external fixator does solve the problem to a great extent, but it often leads to malunion, , delayed union, loss of reduction and pin track infection. Moreover, the pins act as an obstacle to subsequent wound cover.
|How to cite this URL:|
Azam Q, Sherwani M, Abbas M, Gupta R, Asif N, Sabir A B. Internal fixation in compound type III fractures presenting after golden period. Indian J Orthop [serial online] 2007 [cited 2019 Sep 22];41:204-8. Available from: http://www.ijoonline.com/text.asp?2007/41/3/204/33683
Good to excellent results with primary internal fixation in compound fracture following strict protocol have been described. ,,,
The available literature on the subject of internal fixation in compound fractures has not specifically mentioned the exact delay in operation since the time of injury. Only a few articles ,, which exclusively deal with internal fixation in compound Type III fractures are available.
With impaired vascularity in the zone of injury, the body's immune system is compromised. During the first two hours, the host defense works to decrease the overall bacterial load. During the next four hours the number of bacteria remains fairly constant, with the bacteria that are multiplying and those that are being killed by the host defense being about equal. These first six hours are thus called the golden period, because after this period, invading organisms, in the presence of abundant necrotic tissues, replicate in logarithmic fashion to establish a clinical infection. A contaminated wound is considered infected after 12h. The time limit is shorter in a severely contaminated wound with severe soft tissue injury. Internal fixation is advocated within 6-8h in majority of their cases, which is considered the golden period for any surgical intervention.
Unfortunately, in developing countries due to lack of healthcare facilities, ignorance and poverty, patients often reach the hospital late after the few initial precious hours have passed.
In this prospective study of 63 patients (70 fractures), we present our results of internal fixation in Type IIIA and IIIB compound fractures, which were fixed after 6h but within 24h.
| Materials and Methods|| |
In this prospective study between February 1996 to October 2000, 63 patients having 70 compound Gustilo Type III fractures (46 IIIA, 24 IIIB) were included. There were 46 males and 17 females, M:F ratio being 2.7:1. Age of the patients ranged from eight years to 65 years with mean age of 37 years. Wounds were classified using Gustilo's classification system.  Only compound Type IIIA and IIIB fractures operated after 6h but within 24h were included in this series [Figure - 1],[Figure - 2]. Patients with compound fracture Type IIIC and those having paraplegia following associated spinal injuries were not included in this study, to avoid bias in the result.
In the emergency room before splinting the extremity, gentle wound toilet with copious amount (3-5 liters) of sterile saline was done and the wound was covered with sterile dressing. All patients received third generation Cephalosporin (1g stat, then 1g six-hourly) and Amikacin (5-7 mg/kg stat, then 15 mg/kg/day in divided doses) for three days. Oral antibiotic was then continued for 10 to 12 days.
The injuries were caused by road traffic accidents in 35 patients (55.55%), industrial accidents in eight (12.69%), fall from height in seven (11.11%), gunshot injuries in five (7.93%), crush injuries in four (6.34%) and others in four patients (6.34%). Associated injuries included ipsilateral and contralateral lower extremity fracture (n=10), fracture of the upper extremity (n=11), clavicle fracture (n=8), thoracic injuries (n=7) and pelvic injuries (n=6).
The different fracture patterns noted in our series were transverse fractures (n=17), oblique and spiral fractures (n=10), comminuted fractures (n=22), segmental fractures (n=12) and intercondylar fractures (n=9). [Table - 1] details the site of fracture, type of compounding and internal fixation device used. Selection of the implant depended upon the age of the patient, site of fracture and geometry of the fracture.
Nine fractures reported within 6-10h of injury while 27, 23 and 11 reported after 10-14h, 14-18h and 18-24h respectively. Two fractures were fixed within 6-10h of injury while 23, 29 and 16 were fixed after 10-14h, 14-18h and 18-24h respectively. The patients were taken for surgical debridement and fixation, on an average within 4.7h (range 2-11h) after reaching the hospital. Besides late presentation other causes of delay in fixation were associated injuries to other vital organ requiring operation (n=13), need to perform additional diagnostic procedure (n=9) and unavailability of operation theater (n=6).
Aggressive debridement that involved exploration of the wound, excision of devitalized tissues and removal of foreign materials, was performed meticulously. In cases (n=42) where the viability of marginal tissue remained doubtful, repeat debridement was undertaken within 48 to 72h. Soft tissue coverage depended on the operating surgeon's appraisal of the wound. Once the wound looked healthy with sprouting granulation tissues early coverage was planned without delay. The average number of surgeries performed was 4.5 (3 to 8) including debridement and removal of implant.
As recommended by Whittle et al.,  unreamed nailing was encouraged in our series of patients. However, care was taken that the diameter of the nail for the femur must be at least 10 mm and for the tibia 9 mm. In four cases of the femur and nine cases of tibia reaming was undertaken to attain the said goal. In the remaining 19 diaphyseal fractures (four femur and 15 tibia) unreamed nailing was performed.
In this series we divided all diaphyseal fractures (n=32) of the lower extremities into two subgroups. The first subgroup contained 21 fractures that had bone defects less than 2 cm in length and/or cortical apposition more than 50%. Five of these fractures united after primary internal fixation whereas in the remaining 16 additional procedures like dynamization (n=9), exchange nailing (n=5) and cancellous bone grafting (n=2) were undertaken to promote union. Bone grafting was done in two patients after six months where the butterfly fragment was not in contact with either of the major fragments and did not show sign of union. Dynamization (n=9) was performed after 16-20 weeks when it was assessed radiologically that dynamization will permit compression at fracture site without compromising stability. In another five cases of Group 1 where fracture failed to unite even after 10-12 months, closed exchange nailing after thorough reaming was performed.
The second subgroup contained 11 patients having bone loss more than 2 cm and/or cortical apposition less than 50%. Bone grafting was done in all of them after the wound was fully re-epithelialized. Three of the 11 cases required two bone grafting procedures. In fractures requiring flap, grafting was undertaken only after three to five weeks of successful coverage of wound.
The various wound management techniques used in this series were primary closure (over vacuum suction drain without any tension at the stitch site), delayed closure (n=24) done in three to five days, split-thickness skin graft (5-10 days) and flap cover (within 5 to 15 days). Primary closure was not done in any of Type IIIB fractures. Immediate primary closure (n=18), delayed primary closure (n=6) and split-thickness skin graft (n=12) was done in 36 Type IIIA fractures. Flap cover was performed in 10 cases of Type IIIA and in all the cases of Type IIIB fractures after the appearance of healthy granulation tissue. The gastro-soleus muscle was used as local flap for coverage of open tibial fractures in nine cases.
Active and passive physiotherapy of the joints was encouraged as soon as possible. However, mobilization of patients varied depending on the type of fixation, the requirement of plastic surgery and the presence of other injuries. Follow-up of at least 18 months with a mean of 28 months (range 18-48 months) was available at the time of the final evaluation of the result.
| Result|| |
In this study, Katenjian  criteria, that include degree of pain, range of motion and deformity to evaluate functional result of upper extremity and also consider gait while assessing result of lower extremity, have been used. Outcome was divided into Excellent (no pain with normal range of motion in the joint), Good (occasional pain with >75% joint motion and normal gait), Fair (pain with ordinary activities, joint motion >50% and walking with limp) and Poor (constant pain, joint motion <50%, deformity and need of cane/crutch for walking). Deep infection was defined as purulent discharge from the tissue contiguous with the fracture site, which occurred in 11 cases (four Type III A, seven Type III B). Average time required to achieve union for diaphyseal fractures of the femur was 6.5 months (5-13 months), of the tibia 7.8 months (6-18 months), of the humerus 4.5 months (3-7 months) and that of forearm bones 5.6 months (4-9 months). Delayed union was seen in 11 cases. Of these, five fractures which included fracture both bone forearm with Talwalker nail (n=2), fracture shaft of humerus with interlock nail (n=2) and subtrochantric fracture with proximal femoral nail (n=1), united without any intervention. The remaining six fractures where additional procedures were performed to stimulate union included two fractures of the tibia requiring bone graft and four diaphyseal fractures (three tibia and one femur) which required dynamization. Nonunion was noted in five cases, which included two cases of diaphyseal fractures of the femur and three cases of tibia. Closed exchange nailing was performed in all of them to obtain union.
Overall 44 (62.85%), 30 out of 46 (65.21% in IIIA) and 14 out of 24 (58.33% in IIIB) showed good to excellent results [Table - 2] in our series which was comparable with the results found in the literature.
| Discussion|| |
Davis  performed the first immediate internal fixation following timely initial debridement of open fractures. Many orthopedic surgeons and traumatologists ,,, have since then reported satisfactory results of immediate open reduction and internal fixation for all compound fractures. However, the issue of internal fixation in compound Type III fractures still remains controversial, especially in those fractures presenting late after passage of the initial golden hours. Mc Graw et al.,  noted high rate of infection if nailing was done after removal of fixator. Katezian  , Zadic  and Yokoyama et al.  believed there are definitive advantages of primary internal fixation provided infection could be prevented by careful and radical debridement and use of antibiotics.
The overall rate of deep infection in our study was 15.71% (n=11) (8.7% in Type IIIA and 29.16% in Type IIIB). Infection rate in compound Type III fractures as reported previously in the literature ,,,,,, ranged from 4.4-9.09% for Type IIIA fractures and from 23-35% for IIIB fractures. Z-test for proportion was used for statistical analysis and a statistically significant difference in deep infection rate between Type IIIA and IIIB fractures was noted ( P < 0.01). Antibiotics were continued for 10-12 days in our series, the rationale being that wound heals by this time. However, recent reports  have shown that antibiotics given for three to five days are just as effective in preventing wound infection and have the advantage that if infection develops, it will manifest while the patient is still in the hospital.
Sinclair et al.  suggested soft tissue coverage following adequate radical debridement as a single-stage procedure. In our series, of the 11 cases which got infected, in seven cases fixation was performed within 16h of injury and in all of them primary closure was provided after debridement in the same sitting. Though the number of cases was inadequate for statistical analysis, authors feel primary closure should be avoided even in slightest doubt, especially when fixation is delayed and this is in consistence with Gustilo et al. , , Blick et al. ,  Byrd et al.,  and and Patzkins et al.,  who support serial debridement and early (3-15 days) soft tissue coverage.
In our series, we noted that the wounds when covered within a week or 10 days after injury were associated with significantly fewer major complications than the wounds that were covered late. This is in consistence with Fischer et al.  and Byrd et al.  and supports the concept that rich vascularity of early muscle cover is effective in removing microbial contamination and accelerates fracture healing.
Of the 32 diaphyseal fractures (tibia and femur), reaming was performed in 13 cases and unreamed nailing in 19 patients. As the number of cases were less, the authors cannot draw a definite conclusion regarding the outcome in reamed vis-à-vis unreamed nailing. Though the grade of compounding did not influence the decision whether to ream or not the authors feel, excessive reaming in compound fractures must be discouraged, as it renders the endosteal surface ischemic and causes further disruption of medullary blood supply in a bone already denuded of periosteum.  Chapman , stated that reamed nailing carries an unacceptably high rate of infection. However, Lhowe et al.,  concluded that reamed nail provides better fixation decreasing incidence of malunion and also reduces the need of bone grafting.
| Conclusion|| |
After having obtained 62.85% good to excellent results the authors strongly feel that internal fixation can be safely undertaken within 24h of injury in compound Type III fractures. Metallic internal fixation, if judiciously performed gives parallel or superior results than external fixator device or delayed internal fixation after removal of external fixator system.
Meticulous and repeated debridement is the key to successful management of the open fractures. Assessment of the viability of damaged muscle in such circumstances is difficult and thus we discourage primary coverage of the wounds at the time of first debridement. However, early wound coverage (within 3-15 days) aids the body in sealing off further entry of bacteria. Furthermore, early flap also enhances healing of fracture by increasing vascularity. Internal fixation reduces hospital stay, achieves better anatomical and functional results and it does not hamper early soft tissue reconstruction.
| References|| |
|1.||McGraw JM, Lim EV. Treatment of open tibial-shaft fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988;70:900-11. |
|2.||Gustilo RB, Mendoza RM, Williams DN. Problems in the management of type III (severe) open fractures: A new classification of type III open fractures. J Trauma 1984;24:742-6. [PUBMED] |
|3.||Whittle AP, Russel TA, Taylor JC, Lavelle DG. Treatment of open fractures of tibial shaft with the use interlocking nailing without reaming. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:1162-71. |
|4.||Katenjian AY, Shelton ML. Primary internal fixation open fractures: A retrospective study of the use of metallic internal fixation in fresh open fractures. J Trauma 1972;12:756-63. |
|5.||Davis AG. Primary closure of compound fracture wounds. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1948;30:405-15. |
|6.||Zadic FR. Primary internal fixation of compound fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1953;35:146. |
|7.||Yokoyama K, Shindo M, Itoman M, Yamamoto M, Sasomoto N. Immediate internal fixation for open fractures of the long bones of the upper and lower extremities. J Trauma 1994;37:230-6. |
|8.||Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM, Quaba AA, Christie J. Locked intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991;73:959-64. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|9.||O'Brien PJ, Meek RN, Powell JN, Blachut PA. Primary intramedullary nailing of open femoral shaft fractures. J Trauma 1991;31:113-6. [PUBMED] |
|10.||Caudle RJ, Stern PJ. Severe open fractures of the Tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987;69:801-7. |
|11.||Clancy GJ, Hansen ST Jr. Open fractures of Tibia: A review of one hundred and two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:118-22. |
|12.||George C 3 rd , Byrd HH, Jones RE. Primary versus delayed soft tissue coverage for severe open tibial fractures. A comparison of results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;178:54-63. |
|13.||Patzakis MJ, Harvey JP Jr, Ivler D. The role of antibiotics in the management of open fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974;56:532-41. |
|14.||Sinclair JS, NcNally MA, Small JO, Yeates HA. Primary free flap cover of open tibial fractures. Injury 1997;28:581-7. |
|15.||Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: Retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:453-8. [PUBMED] |
|16.||Blick SS, Brumback RJ, Lakatos R, Poka A, Burgess AR. Early prophylactic bone grafting of high energy tibial fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;240:21-41. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|17.||Byrd HS, Cierny G 3 rd , Tebbetts JB. The management of open tibial fractures with associated soft-tissue loss: External pin fixation with early flap coverage. Plast Reconstrs Surg 1981;68:73-82. |
|18.||Fischer MD, Gustilo RB, Varecke TF. The timing of flap coverage, bone grafting and intramedullary nailing in patients who have a fractures of tibial shaft with extensive soft tissue injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:1316-22. |
|19.||Chapman MW. The role of intramedullary fixation in open fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;212:26-34. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|20.||Chapman MW, Mahoney M. The role of early internal fixation in the management of open fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979;138:120-31. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|21.||Lhowe DW, Hansen ST. Immediate nailing of open fractures of the femoral shaft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:812-20. [PUBMED] |
|22.||Patzakis MJ, Wilkins J, Moore TM. Considerations in reducing the infection rate in open tibial fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983;178:36-41. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, J.N Medical College, A.M.U, Aligarh
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[Figure - 1], [Figure - 2]
[Table - 1], [Table - 2]