Neurobionplus
Home About Journal AHEAD OF PRINT Current Issue Back Issues Instructions Submission Search Subscribe Blog    
Login 

Users Online: 598 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
 


 
CASE REPORT Table of Contents   
Year : 2007  |  Volume : 41  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 72-75
Rudimentary third lower limb in association with spinal dysraphism: Two cases


Department of Radiology, Grant Medical College and Sir J.J Group of Hospital, Byculla, Mumbai - 400 008, India

Click here for correspondence address and email
 

   Abstract 

Spinal dysraphism is a common congenital anomaly with many associated variants. One of the rarest associated findings is a full grown or rudimentary third limb, collectively called Tripagus. We present two cases of spinal dysraphism with rudimentary third limb arising from the ilium.

Keywords: Rudimentary/accessory third limb, spinal dysraphism, tripagus

How to cite this article:
Wasnik AP, Shinagare A, Lalchandani UR, Gujrathi R, Pai BU. Rudimentary third lower limb in association with spinal dysraphism: Two cases. Indian J Orthop 2007;41:72-5

How to cite this URL:
Wasnik AP, Shinagare A, Lalchandani UR, Gujrathi R, Pai BU. Rudimentary third lower limb in association with spinal dysraphism: Two cases. Indian J Orthop [serial online] 2007 [cited 2019 May 22];41:72-5. Available from: http://www.ijoonline.com/text.asp?2007/41/1/72/30530
Defects in the early embryonic stages produce spinal dysraphism, which is characterized by anomalous differentiation and fusion of dorsal midline structures. Spinal dysraphism may be categorized clinically into two subsets, open spinal dysraphism and closed spinal dysraphism. Rudimentary accessory (third) limb is a very rare anomaly seen in association with spinal dysraphism. We present two such cases.


   Case Reports Top


Case 1

A 11-year-old boy presented with progressive weakness in the right lower limb and a soft swelling over the lower back since birth. Patient had history of urinary incontinence. Examination revealed a soft, nontender, compressible immobile swelling and presence of two nondischarging dermal sinuses adjacent to the swelling.

Radiographs of the lumbosacral spine showed presence of a spina bifida at the L4 and L5 segments and a posterior soft tissue mass.

Computed tomography (CT) confirmed findings of spina bifida along with presence of a lipomyelomeningocele and two dermal sinuses. A bony strut was noted arising from the left ilium, extending upward. It had two long bone segments, the longer segment measured approximately 6.5cm and the shorter segment approx 1.5cm, with a rudimentary joint between them. No other anorectal or urogenital abnormalities were detected.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed these findings of lipomeningocele with dermal sinus and bony strut. These bony structures may represent a developmentally abortive accessory limb [Figure - 1].

Case 2

A nine-year-old boy presented with complaints of progressive difficulty in walking, urinary incontinence and deformity and nonhealing ulcers of the feet since past one year and a history of a swelling over the sacral region present since birth, which was constant in size.

On examination, he had weakness in both his lower limbs, muscle wasting of both legs (more on the left side) and his left foot had an equinus deformity. The swelling over his sacral region was soft, compressible and nonmobile. No other cutaneous stigmata were present. He had trophic ulcers over his buttocks and over pressure points of his feet.

Plain radiograph of the lumbosacral spine [Figure - 2] showed absence of the left side of the sacrum (Scimitar sacrum) and spina bifida of the L5 vertebra. Soft tissue swelling over the sacrum was also visible.

CT confirmed the L5 spina bifida and absence of the left half of the sacrum. A hypodense soft tissue of fat attenuation was seen extending from the spinal canal into the soft tissue swelling over the sacrum (lipomeningocele). A bony strut was seen to arise from the left iliac blade measuring approximately 5cm, which could represent a rudimentary limb [Figure - 3][Figure - 4]. No anorectal or urogenital abnormality was evident.

The MRI scan performed with T1WI and T2WI sequence in the saggittal, coronal and axial plane revealed spinal dysraphism with a large intraspinal lipoma merging with the dorsal aspect of the cord and continuous with the subcutaneous lipoma. The spinal cord appeared to be terminating in this lipomatous mass. This lipoma was also extending subcutaneously through the spina bifida defect. A bony structure with cortex and medulla was seen to arise from the left iliac blade extending downward, which could represent a developmentally aborted third limb [Figure - 5][Figure - 6].


   Discussion Top


Spinal dysraphism is a generic term describing pathologic conditions related to improper closure of the caudal neuropore. It encompasses all conditions associated with spina bifida. Spinal dysraphisms result from derangement in the normal embryogenetic cascade occurring during a limited period of time during early embryonic development, between the second and sixth gestational weeks. Gastrulation (weeks 2-3), primary neurulation (weeks 3-4) and secondary neurulation and retrogressive differentiation (weeks 5-6) are the steps involved.

Spinal dysraphism may be divided into two groups. Open spinal dysraphism are always associated with a Chiari II malformation and include myelomeningocele, myeloschisis, hemimyelomeningocele and hemimyelocele. Closed spinal dysraphism are covered by intact skin, although cutaneous stigmata may be present. Two subsets may be identified based on whether a subcutaneous mass is present in the low back. Closed spinal dysraphisms with mass comprise lipomyeloschisis, lipomyelomeningocele, meningocele and myelocystocele. Closed spinal dysraphism without mass comprise complex dysraphic states (ranging from complete dorsal enteric fistula to neurenteric cysts, split cord malformations, dermal sinuses, caudal regression and spinal segmental dysgenesis), bony spina bifida, tight filum terminale, filar and intradural lipomas and persistent terminal ventricle.

A full grown or rudimentary third limb is a very rare association seen with spinal dysraphism and few cases are mentioned in the literature[1],[2],[3],[4],[5] but its exact incidence is unknown. Various associations of urogenital duplication, anorectal malformation and other anomalies have been found.[6]

Accessory limb may be a result of very early splitting of the limb bud arising from the paraxial mesoderm. It is proposed that the growth of the accessory limb occurs from a mesodermal blastema that is a result of de-differentiation from Schwann cells.[2] A primary mesodermal defect involving both the limb bud and the adjacent para-axial mesoderm may explain the association of this anomaly with spina bifida.[7] A possibility of twinning has also been postulated in an accessory limb arm.[8]

Developmentally aborted accessory limb may be an incidental finding in a patient presenting with neurological or other complaints associated with spinal dysraphism.

In cases like ours, diagnosis of an abortive limb is mainly radiological as there may be no clinical sign to suggest its presence. It may be seen on plain radiograph as a bony strut arising from pelvic bones. It is well appreciated on CT or MRI. These bones have well formed cortex and medulla and follow the intensity of normal bones on MRI. Rudimentary joint may be present as well. There may be muscles attached to these bones.

MRI is the modality of choice, as it can assess other associated conditions like meningocele, myelomeningocele, lipomeningocele, split cord malformations, dermal sinuses and associated anomalies.

Treatment in the form of surgical correction has been mentioned in cases with completely developed third limb. It includes excision of the accessory limb or at times disarticulation and reconstruction of the accessory limb which has no innervation with removal of one set of duplicated lower genitourinary and alimentary tracts with reconstruction of the pelvis.[9] In a case of dipegus, mentioned in the literature, with three accessory legs, the parasitic pelvis and rest of the legs were extirpated with an attempt to correct the associated anorectal or genitourinary malformation.[6]

The exact role of surgery in rudimentary or aborted accessory limb as in our case, where there was no cosmetic defect or neurological manifestation due to it, remains questionable.

 
   References Top

1.Nanni L, Perrelli L, Velardi F. Accessory lower limb in a newborn with multiple malformations. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1994;4:51-3.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  
2.Chadha R, Bagga D, Malhotra CJ, Dhar A, Kumar A. Accessory limb attached to the back. J Pediatr Surg 1993;28:1615-7.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
3.Krishna A, Lal P. Accessory limbs associated with spina bifida - A second look. Pediatr Surg Int 1999;15:248-50.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
4.Copley IB, Derwael EF. Investigation and treatment of a multiple limb birth. Br J Neurosurg 1991;5:281-7.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  
5.Taniguchi K, Aoki Y, Kurimoto H, Okamura T. Baby with third leg. J Pediatr Surg 1975;10:143-4.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  
6.Hagberg S, Rubenson A, Lansinger O. A case of surgically treated dipygus (caudal duplication). J Pediatr Surg 1986;21:58-9.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  
7.Krishra A, Chandna S, Mishra NK, Gupta AK, Upadhyaya P. Accessory limb associated with spina bifida. J Pediatr Surg 1989;24:604-6.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
8.Humphreys RP, Manwaring KH, Carroli NC. Accessory arm - dyraphism or disparity? J Neurosurg 1991;74:297-300.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Simpson JS, Gibson DA, Cook GT. Surgical correction of caudal duplication (Dipygus). J Pediatr Surg 1973;8:935-8.  Back to cited text no. 9  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]

Top
Correspondence Address:
Ashish P Wasnik
C/o Mr. R. Lalchandani, 2, Neel Kamal Apts, O.T Section, Ulhasnagar - 421 001
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.30530

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

[Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3], [Figure - 4], [Figure - 5], [Figure - 6]

This article has been cited by
1 Lumbosacral lipomyelomeningocele with anomalous osseous limb in a 3-month-old female
Sean L. Wilkes,Jay J. Choi,Veronica J. Rooks
Radiology Case Reports. 2015; 10(1): 1051
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 An accessory limb with lipomyelomeningocele in a male
Robert F. Murphy,Brian H. Cohen,Michael S. Muhlbauer,James W. Eubanks,Jeffrey R. Sawyer,Alice Moisan,Derek M. Kelly
Pediatric Surgery International. 2013; 29(7): 749
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Adult with sacral lipomyelomeningocele covered by an anomalous bone articulated with iliac bone: Computed tomography and magnetic resonance images
Lee, S.H. and Je, B.-K. and Kim, S.-B. and Kim, B.H.
Congenital Anomalies. 2012; 52(2): 115-118
[Pubmed]
4 Adult with sacral lipomyelomeningocele covered by an anomalous bone articulated with iliac bone: Computed tomography and magnetic resonance images
Seung Hwa Lee,Bo-Kyung Je,Sung-Bum Kim,Baek Hyun Kim
Congenital Anomalies. 2012; 52(2): 115
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
   
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


 
    Abstract
    Case Reports
    Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4362    
    Printed110    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded184    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal